To: infoguy
And rather than providing its readers an honest critique, the Times' "review" is nothing less than a full-on Darwin propaganda piece.Why so angry? I thought the ID types wanted to "teach the controversy". (I guess only so long as no one "teaches" back!)
25 posted on
07/30/2006 2:36:58 PM PDT by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: Stultis
"Why so angry? I thought the ID types wanted to 'teach the controversy'." (I guess only so long as no one "teaches" back!)You don't get it. Read the article. ID proponents do want both sides heard, but forums like the LA Times are only presenting one side of the issue!
28 posted on
07/30/2006 3:37:17 PM PDT by
infoguy
(www.frankenlies.com ... www.themediareport.com ...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson