Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Invisible Gorilla
If you're conceding that Simcox "should have taken care of this by now," then you're conceding that the November 15 extension is an unsatisfactory resolution.

No, I am not. The Inquisition over this is way out of propoertion to the offense. Namely because the agenda of those carrying out this Inquisition is not about the offense, but attacking Simcox's larger movement. The same perps were all over the Minutemen and their border patrols. Ever since the critics were found to be nothing but hot air over those patrols, they have been waiting for the next chance to strike. And now they have it.

I see lots of fair-minded people making a few posts on this. But I see a few folks obsessing on this day after day, posting until 3 in the morning. That is not the hallmark of the concerned. That is the hallmark of someone with their own agenda that they are not willing to openly state.

66 posted on 07/30/2006 9:09:32 AM PDT by dirtboy (Glad to see the ink was still working in Bush's veto pen, now that he wisely used it on this bill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Look, you can't say it's ok for Simcox to wait until the November extension and also say that he should have taken care of this by now. You can have one position or the other, but you can't have both.

Complaints about an Inquisition, even to the extent that they are valid, are really a call to change the subject from the glaring liablity that Simcox has become. Defending Simcox only enables his opponents. Their best case scenario is that Simcox continues to hunker down behind his November extension.

71 posted on 07/30/2006 9:21:14 AM PDT by Invisible Gorilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson