Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Look, you can't say it's ok for Simcox to wait until the November extension and also say that he should have taken care of this by now. You can have one position or the other, but you can't have both.

Complaints about an Inquisition, even to the extent that they are valid, are really a call to change the subject from the glaring liablity that Simcox has become. Defending Simcox only enables his opponents. Their best case scenario is that Simcox continues to hunker down behind his November extension.

71 posted on 07/30/2006 9:21:14 AM PDT by Invisible Gorilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Invisible Gorilla

Or he builds another fence and you start harping on how it's inappropriate to. Just as his critics said it was inapropriate to monitor the border, that he's racist, has gay people working for him, violates the rights of "immigrants", yadda yadda yadda.

The articles posted in the press are mainly rehashes of old news reposted as new.


74 posted on 07/30/2006 9:35:53 AM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Invisible Gorilla
Look, you can't say it's ok for Simcox to wait until the November extension and also say that he should have taken care of this by now.

Yes, I can. On a political level, he should have. On a legal level, he is well within such boundaries.

75 posted on 07/30/2006 9:36:28 AM PDT by dirtboy (Glad to see the ink was still working in Bush's veto pen, now that he wisely used it on this bill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson