But there is no evidence he has, other than statements from digruntled former members, which typically are discounted by the fair-minded.
I agree he should have taken care of this by now. But most of those supporting him have said he MUST meet the November 15th deadline. But that isn't good enough for certain people with their own agendas. I find it odd that certain inviduals are posting on this subject just about every day, often until wee hours of the morning. That does not indicate normal fiduaciary concern, but an odd obsession that goes well beyond what is stated for the reasons for such concern.
There is further evidence, which is his lack of openness and accountability.
I agree he should have taken care of this by now.
Thank you.
But most of those supporting him have said he MUST meet the November 15th deadline. But that isn't good enough for certain people with their own agendas.
I'm not sure why he couldn't have, and shouldn't have, met the May 15 deadline, or the August 15 deadline extension.
He MUST meet the November 15 deadline, because the government will not allow him to put it off any longer than that.
I find it odd that certain inviduals are posting on this subject just about every day, often until wee hours of the morning. That does not indicate normal fiduaciary concern, but an odd obsession that goes well beyond what is stated for the reasons for such concern.
Seems to me that you've been right there until the wee hours.
What I don't understand is why you're continuing to defend him when you also state that it does look just as bad as his critics are saying.
Personally, I support the effort to control the borders, and I do not want to see a lack of honesty and accountability by one man (or one group) undermine the effort.
Cognitive dissonance does some pretty strange stuff to the mind.