Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican judges face tough test in disputed presidential race (public hearings start today)
AP via The Pueblo Chieftain (CO) ^ | 29 July 2006 | JULIE WATSON

Posted on 07/29/2006 1:46:43 PM PDT by Stultis

Mexican judges face tough test in disputed presidential race

By JULIE WATSON
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

MEXICO CITY  -  The future of Mexico’s young democracy lies in the hands of seven judges who have the final word on a disputed presidential election that has strained class divisions and threatened the nation’s stability, with one candidate calling for millions to protest.

The magistrates  -  including Mexico’s first female district judge and a respected author on ethics and democracy  -  have shown toughness and independence in thousands of electoral disputes, ruling against all three major parties.

But they have never faced a challenge like this. Mexicans are counting on them to find a peaceful solution to a battle between Felipe Calderon, the ruling party candidate backed by the business community, and Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, a fiery populist.

An official count gave Calderon a lead of less than 0.6 percent. Despite the uncertainty, he said Friday he was setting up a committee to lay the groundwork for his administration.

Lopez Obrador’s Democratic Revolution Party said it will testify Saturday at the first public hearings before the Federal Electoral Tribunal, beginning what will likely be a weekslong investigation into 364 complaints from the parties.

The judges, who must issue a ruling by Sept. 6, face three choices: declaring a winner, ordering a recount, or annulling the vote. Each could have grave consequences.

If the judges confirm Calderon won the July 2 election, Lopez Obrador is likely to reject the ruling and stage massive protests. The former Mexico City mayor has already held two mass demonstrations since the election, and has called for supporters to fill the capital’s main Zocalo plaza Sunday.

If they order a recount, they risk weakening a law designed to combat fraud by prohibiting ballot boxes from being opened unless there is evidence of irregularities.

If they annul the elections, they will leave Mexico without a president-elect for more than a year, threatening the country’s stability. No candidate has supported annulling the vote.

‘‘These judges have impeccable credentials,’’ said George Grayson, a Mexico expert at the College of William & Mary in Virginia. ‘‘They have stepped on everybody’s toes in delivering more than 20,000 decisions. I think they will deliver a deliberate, fair and impartial judgment.’’

The judges are the country’s highest paid public officials with salaries of about $415,000 a year to ensure no one can buy them off, and Mexican law gives them wide discretion. This will likely be the biggest decision of the 10-year term that ends in October for six of the seven magistrates. One was nominated in 2003.

Since the Senate confirmed them as the country’s first electoral judges a decade ago, they have nullified 17 local, state and congressional elections. The biggest case involved the 2000 gubernatorial race in Lopez Obrador’s home state of Tabasco, where the judges ruled that the ruling-party governor interfered.

Lopez Obrador has alleged the same about President Vicente Fox in the presidential race and is banking on the law’s ambiguity to win a recount of all 41 million votes. The ruling National Action Party says a full recount violates Mexican law.

Lopez Obrador’s party says it has found irregularities at 40 percent of the 130,488 polling places. It also has accused Calderon of running a dirty campaign that gave him an unfair advantage.

The court could rule unfair conditions altered the results and annul the elections. Mexico’s Congress then would have to name an interim president by a two-thirds vote and call new elections within 18 months.

But Grayson said the court is unlikely to do that. When it threw out the Tabasco race, ‘‘the fraud was ubiquitous, it was everywhere.’’ Electoral officials and most international observers have said the July 2 election was largely clean.

‘‘I don’t think there’s a snowball’s chance in the Sonoran desert that they will annul this election,’’ Grayson said.

A poll published Thursday by El Universal newspaper found 48 percent of Mexicans support a recount and 28 percent were opposed. The same poll, however, found only 16 percent would protest if the court ruled Calderon had won. The company Ipsos-Bimsa interviewed 1,000 adults across Mexico between July 21-24 and the poll had a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.

Lopez Obrador has blamed Mexico’s wealthy elite for the election result and said the poor, who make up his main support base, would fight for him until the end.

On Friday, more than 100 people, including Triqui Indian women dressed in their traditional woven tunics, protested outside the tribunal, plastered with signs claiming the election was stolen from Lopez Obrador.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Mexico; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: amlo; calderon; elections; mexelect; mexicanelection; mexico; obrador; prd; pri
CAPTION BONUS!

The Pueblo Chieftain Online
AP PHOTO/EDUARDO VERDUGO
Mexican wrestler 'Little Ray of Hope' calls for a vote-by-vote recount of recent presidential elections outside of the Federal Electoral Tribunal in Mexico City on Friday.

1 posted on 07/29/2006 1:46:45 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stultis
"No! I'm NOT posing with the guy in the bee suit.
I work alone, dammit!"

2 posted on 07/29/2006 1:50:19 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
whats tough about this??

national recounts without evidence of fraud is not legal. duh.

with new voter ID's they just had the cleanest election ever seen on this planet.

3 posted on 07/29/2006 1:52:14 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
The judges are the country’s highest paid public officials with salaries of about $415,000 a year to ensure no one can buy them off, and Mexican law gives them wide discretion.

Yeah, about this concept? Multi-billionares cheat, get bought off, steal. Paying them lots of money just leaves open the door for them wanting more. You can't buy honest people, and they won't seek outrageous salaries to accomplish what is their civic duty.
4 posted on 07/29/2006 1:52:18 PM PDT by kingu (Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

I'm reasonably certain the judges will make the right decision.

Just as I am reasonably certain ObraGore will only end up embarrasing and discrediting himself with his antics.

The real humiliation is on us. Why is it even poor, illiterate campesinos can register properly and produce a votor ID on election day and yet we yanquis are somehow considered unable to so?

I think the Mexican example could provide serious ammunition for any politico who wants to effect "real" election reform.


5 posted on 07/29/2006 2:09:55 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

"The future of Mexico’s young democracy lies in the hands of seven judges"

That's just wrong, on so many levels.


6 posted on 07/29/2006 2:15:56 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
I've been following this controversy very closely and I have translated something in the neighborhood of twenty online articles from Mexican and Latin American web sites which I have posted on this board (forum keyword search using unique keyword stjtranslation).

I cannot but imagine that the electoral tribunal will have to order some kind of a recount but I doubt that they will order the recounting of everything. Perhaps we may see a recount of only those precincts in which Lopez Obrador's PRD did not have their own representatives (something like 20+% from memory), coupled with a reexamination of the official reports from all other precincts in the presence of party representatives. But I cannot believe they will recount every ballot one at a time.

And let me make one other comment if I may; I am convinced that if a full recount of every ballot occurred we would see AMLO's percentage in PAN country pick up and Calderon's percentage in PRD country do the same. I am convinced there may have been some pro-Calderon fraud in the Mexican state of Guanajuato but I do not doubt PRD fraud in the several states in and around the Yucatan peninsula.

Put your money on Calderon.
7 posted on 07/29/2006 4:31:32 PM PDT by StJacques (Liberty is always unfinished business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

Leftists are the same the world over. What they can't win at the ballot box they try to steal in a courtroom!


8 posted on 07/29/2006 4:47:27 PM PDT by PhillyRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
"The future of Mexico’s young democracy lies in the hands of seven judges who have the final word on a disputed presidential election...The magistrates - have shown toughness and independence in thousands of electoral disputes, ruling against all three major parties."
"On Friday, more than 100 people, including Triqui Indian women dressed in their traditional woven tunics...plastered with signs claiming the election was stolen from Lopez Obrador."

This "young democracy" seems to have been going on for some time when 'traditional woven tunics' include signs claiming the socialists stole the election from the communists.

Seriously, The same media bemoaning a 'young democracy' has for years told us that mexico (hack/spit) is a sound investment and a good neighbor.

Sounds just as trite and phony today as it did back when Reagan caved.

If the border isn't closed NOW, we'll have a wave of 'asylum seekers' like we've never before seen - in less than two months.

9 posted on 07/29/2006 4:59:13 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norton

PAY ATTENTION!! Norton speaks truth. The situation in Mexico could easily go critical. In which case we could end up with millions of refugees on the roads. We can't afford to dawdle over securing our southern border.


10 posted on 07/30/2006 2:36:02 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (WARNING: Alcohol may cause you to think you are whispering when you are definitely not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus; norton; PhillyRepublican; StJacques; Liz; La Enchiladita; HiJinx; gubamyster; ...
There they go in protest at the nation's capital this afternoon, like the creeping crud of tax leeches that took over Washington D.C. long ago:
11 posted on 07/30/2006 11:08:37 AM PDT by Shuttle Shucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

And I imagine, that if the judges do not find for obrador, they will end up with bullets in their heads--put there by the "poor" who have pledged they will keep fighting for him.


12 posted on 07/30/2006 1:41:47 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson