Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Which is exactly what the Clintonistas want. They are letting the moonbats run the DNC for two years in hopes they will screw things up - and then will go back and tell the moonbats it's time to put the adults in charge again if you want to win in 2008.

I'm having trouble understanding this logic, but maybe I'm just too stupid to understand this reasoning.

6 posted on 07/28/2006 9:51:58 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: marvlus
I'm having trouble understanding this logic, but maybe I'm just too stupid to understand this reasoning.

Hillary has a big problem in 2008 as things now stand. If she runs far enough left to satisfy the moonbats in order to get the nomination, she won't be able to get back to the middle.

But by letting the moonbat's spokesman (Dean) run things for two years, if he craters the party in the 2006 elections, it will discredit the ability of the moonbats to win elections - they think Dems don't run leftward enough. The Clintonistas want them to fail so they will be willing to toe the party line in 2008.

9 posted on 07/28/2006 9:57:22 AM PDT by dirtboy (Glad to see the ink was still working in Bush's veto pen, now that he wisely used it on this bill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: marvlus

If you remember that, for the Clintons, Hillary's bid for the WH in 2008 is everything. This way, they get full control of the DNC for that run, when Howie is tarred and feathered after the 2006 elections.


20 posted on 07/28/2006 10:20:54 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson