Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Avro Arrow Test Pilot Rogers Passes Away in T.O. (Toronto)
Canadian Press ^ | July 27, 2006 | Press Staff

Posted on 07/27/2006 6:14:10 PM PDT by NorthOf45

Avro Arrow test pilot Rogers passes away in T.O.

Canadian Press July 27, 2006

TORONTO -- The man who oversaw flight operations for the revolutionary but ill-fated Avro Arrow has died.

A memorial service will be held Thursday in Toronto for Don Rogers, who died of cancer last week at the age of 89.

After the death last year of Arrow test pilot Peter Cope, Rogers became the last surviving test pilot for the company. Formerly Avro's chief test pilot, he went on to become director of flight operations, overseeing Cope and three other pilots involved in the day-to-day testing of the Arrow.

The group's contributions to aviation and Canadian heritage should not be taken lightly, said Andrew Hibbert, president of Arrow Recovery Canada.

"All we ever talk about now is astronauts and people like that, but these were the astronauts of their day,'' Hibbert said. "They were the most advanced and well-trained pilots in the world at that time.''

In addition to being a well-respected pilot, Rogers -- who died July 19 at his home in Toronto -- was very caring and "a gentleman's gentleman,'' said his son Raymond, 65.

"He was very old-school, he really was,'' Raymond said. "He was an absolute gentleman. He was quiet, he was unassuming, he was extremely modest about what he's done and accomplished in his career.''

In addition to Raymond, who wasn't a pilot but worked in aviation for 36 years, Rogers had two other children: Connie Mount, 58, and Stephen, who died in a car accident about 30 years ago.

Rogers made headlines in 1950 when he flew airmail aboard a jet for the first time ever, piloting the company's jetliner from Toronto to New York in 58 minutes -- half the previous record.

The Arrow, an ambitious aircraft that was considered revolutionary and extremely advanced for its time, had its life cut short when the supersonic interceptor jet project was scrapped by the federal Conservative government in 1959.

"1/8The Arrow3/8 was light years ahead of its time,'' said Andrew Hibbert, the president of Arrow Recovery Canada. "When it was built in the 50s it probably was one of the most advanced aircraft in the world.''

After losing his job at Avro, Rogers went on to work for de Havilland as a test pilot.

He never lost his zeal for aviation and he later travelled across the county with his wife, June, sharing his Avro experiences with historians and enthusiasts.

The pilot's lifelong love affair with flying began at the Hamilton Aero Club, where he earned his pilot's licence in 1936 at the age of 20. Flying was his passion, his son said.

"I think he liked the feel of it more than anything else, quite honestly,'' Raymond said.

''He just absolutely loved the physical aspect of it, there's no doubt about it.''

On February 20, 1959, then-prime minister John Diefenbaker announced in the House of Commons that the Arrow program would be cancelled, leading to massive layoffs, and what one expert described as an aerospace brain drain to the United States.

Frank Harvey, president of the Aerospace Heritage Foundation of Canada, said many of Avro's top engineers and other employees moved to the U.S. to work for NASA and were ''instrumental'' in the successful 1969 effort to put a man on the moon.

Money was the reason cited for the cancellation of the Arrow program, but many critics say it would have eventually paid off in the end.

"I think Canada could have saved a lot of money in the long run,'' said Harvey.

''We lost a great deal as far as the aerospace technology and that didn't really pick up until 25 or 30 years later until Canadair started producing the Challenger jets.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: arrow; avro; canada

The Avro Arrow (file)
1 posted on 07/27/2006 6:14:10 PM PDT by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

My Canadian friends (yes, I have friends) still think that the cancellation was due to a nefarious plot by Americans (Boeing, etc).

Of course, later on the Americans would steal various hockey teams, Celine Deon, several comedians.....


2 posted on 07/27/2006 6:24:33 PM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

I have also read that the security at Avro was a huge problem. You couldn't swing a dead seal without hitting someone spying for the Ruskies.
That is why all the dies were broken and the tools smashed.


3 posted on 07/27/2006 6:29:49 PM PDT by Holicheese (Stanley Cup's new home IS North Carolina!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut; GMMAC; Clive

Ping


4 posted on 07/27/2006 6:38:48 PM PDT by AntiKev (Keppler makes the world go 'round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

We are still working on a way to Celine Dione out of the country. She is like athletes foot, just when you think its gone, the rash comes back.


5 posted on 07/27/2006 6:38:50 PM PDT by Holicheese (Stanley Cup's new home IS North Carolina!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
I'm sure the Avro Arrow was a fine plane but it was not superior to the American Phantom II, which also first flew in 1958 and was superior to the Arrow in most, if not all, ways (in fact, some countries still use it).
6 posted on 07/27/2006 6:46:32 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
"Of course, later on the Americans would steal various hockey teams, Celine Deon, several comedians....."

If we offer to buy an upgraded Arrow do you think they'd take back Celine and about half of those comedians?

(OK, just Celine.)

7 posted on 07/27/2006 7:09:19 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
Have any Arrow's survived?


8 posted on 07/27/2006 7:15:01 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

There were a lot of Mach 2 interceptors proposed during the late 50's/early 60's that never got out of prototype. The one that leaps to mind is the F8U-3 "Crusader III". It was a pure interceptor that probably was more maneuverable and certainly faster than the Phantom II. But the Phantom could drop bombs & dual-role aircraft was where it was at.

Lockheed was proposing the YF-12A, a fighter-version of the Mach 3+ SR-71 Blackbird. It even demostrated a look down/shoot down guided missile capability. It lost out to another bomb truck, the General Dynamics F-111. The bet was on low-level penetration rather than high-level/high-speed.


9 posted on 07/27/2006 7:16:29 PM PDT by Tallguy (The problem with this war is the name... You don't wage war against a tactic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
VERY mixed emotions, the Arrow came in a period during which the actual mission requirements were in flux, technology was - just, almost - there, and the economy of scale was becoming critical.

A good airplane manufactured by a slightly less prominent industry, with less chance of selling a package to other countries, was simply not a viable goal.

As much as the EU and 'outsourcing' sound to my ear the same way tin tastes to my tongue: a multinational effort is the only way a Canadian, or even a British, firm with all the best talent in the world is going to profit today (or then).

10 posted on 07/27/2006 7:18:41 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Crusader III bump.

Awesome!

11 posted on 07/27/2006 7:20:26 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
Yeah, but we let 'em keep Leonard Cohen.

;-)

12 posted on 07/27/2006 7:22:48 PM PDT by uglybiker (Don't blame me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
"My Canadian friends ... still think that the cancellation was due to a nefarious plot by Americans "

Then I'd suggest stick with your Canadian FRiends who mostly believe that particular theory to be largely a great steaming pile.

As for the other stolen items mentioned, just come get your Vietnam-era draft dodgers & deserters who continue to be a leftist mainstay up here & all is forgiven, eh?
13 posted on 07/27/2006 7:32:16 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
Sadly no. There are urban legends that one did escape the blow torch and is parked in a barn somewhere, but I doubt it.


14 posted on 07/27/2006 7:34:17 PM PDT by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

Unfortunately, the Arrow never flew with the proper engine. I believe they were ready to install the Iroquois jet engines ... but the program got cancelled. We'll never know its true potential.


15 posted on 07/27/2006 7:45:13 PM PDT by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

It was a really sharp looking plane and it's too bad that internal politics killed it. Didn't most of AVRO's engineers move on to NASA to work on Apollo?


16 posted on 07/27/2006 7:55:12 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
Even with the proper engine, I doubt it would have been superior to the Phantom II, which solved many of the problems covered in that romantic Canadian movie about the Arrow (that almost had it flying Canadians to the Moon) in a different way. Arrow fans make it sound like Americans were years behind them but look at the performance they expected out of the Arrow, even with the right engine, and compare with the Phantom II during the same period.
17 posted on 07/27/2006 11:20:09 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
And don't forget that the Phantom II could operate from aircraft carriers, too.
18 posted on 07/27/2006 11:20:58 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

That "romantic movie" was typical CBC schtick (sp?). I doubt anyone truly knows where the program would have lead and why or how the end of it all came about. I do know that there was a ton of potential there for Canadian industry and technology that was squandered. It's a damn shame.


19 posted on 07/28/2006 5:44:55 AM PDT by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson