Skip to comments.
EDITORIAL: Is Ottawa losing its global voice? (Anti-American, Anti-Israeli BARF ALERT!!!)
Toronto (Red) Star ^
| 07/27/06
Posted on 07/27/2006 8:25:48 AM PDT by Heartofsong83
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Pandering to their leftist base, huh? The Star has a strong anti-Israel bias and is very anti-American.
To: Heartofsong83
Nope. It getting one. The new leadership of Cananda is showing the world it is a serious player on the world stage again. Before the childish platitudes and emotive hysterics flowing from Canada's Leftist Leaders demonstrated they could not be relyed upon as a serious partner in dealing with any global issue.
2
posted on
07/27/2006 8:28:09 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: Heartofsong83; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; ...
Canada ping.
Please send me a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.
3
posted on
07/27/2006 8:29:26 AM PDT
by
fanfan
(WAW - Women Against Weenification!)
To: Heartofsong83
Canada has a "global voice"? News to me.
4
posted on
07/27/2006 8:29:36 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
To: MNJohnnie
Nope. It getting one. The new leadership of Canada is showing the world it is a serious player on the world stage again. Before the childish platitudes and emotive hysterics flowing from Canada's Leftist Leaders demonstrated they could not be relied upon as a serious partner in dealing with any global issue. Ditto to your statement!
5
posted on
07/27/2006 8:32:04 AM PDT
by
A message
(We who care, Can Not Fail)
To: Heartofsong83
"Yet six months later, Harper and the Conservatives appear to be more interested in currying favour with U.S. President George Bush's Republican administration, which is deeply unpopular on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border" Unpopular on both sides of the fence?
GWB WHIPPED KERRY AND THE DEM AGENDA BY ALMOST 4 MILLION VOTES!
6
posted on
07/27/2006 8:33:49 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: Heartofsong83
Har Har Har....... what global voice.
7
posted on
07/27/2006 8:35:23 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: Heartofsong83
G-D BLESS STEPHEN HARPER!!
8
posted on
07/27/2006 8:36:08 AM PDT
by
Alouette
(Psalms of the Day: 10-17)
To: Heartofsong83
But his successor Paul Martin came to power with an eye to repairing Canada-United States relations that were perceived to have become frayed. Yah????? And how did that go?????
9
posted on
07/27/2006 8:48:14 AM PDT
by
CaptainCanada
(Citizenship which costs nothing is worth nothing..........................................)
To: Heartofsong83
Harper was correct in saying Israel has a right to defend itself, but he was wrong not to caution restraint on Israel's part.
Some people are so stupid you honestly wonder how they remember to keep breathing. Winning a war and showing restraint are mutually exclusive. You don't win wars with restraint or measured responses. You win wars by bringing to bear the maximum amount of destructive force in the minimum possible time against your enemy. You bomb him, shell him, shoot him, run him over, even run up to him and beat him with sticks if you have to. But you rain destruction on him until he is utterly and completely defeated. That's how you win a war. You can't do that and show restraint.
10
posted on
07/27/2006 8:48:53 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
To: Heartofsong83
What this dope doesn't get is that Canada's voice is actually STRONGER by virtue of the fact that it is now taking action, rather than sitting on the sidelines and criticizing. Before Harper, you didn't need the maple leaf flag. You could have just taken the American flag, inverted the colors, and called that the Canadian flag, because the only identifier of being Canadian was to be the opposite of an American. Now, they are actually moving and effecting a change in the world. As long as they do, I'll be listening when they speak.
11
posted on
07/27/2006 8:49:34 AM PDT
by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: Heartofsong83
I am getting sick and tired of seeing Toronto Star articles
posted as news items or editorials topics almost on a daily basis.
From now on please post them under Political Humour/Cartoons only.
12
posted on
07/27/2006 8:53:19 AM PDT
by
Allan
(*-O)):~{>)
To: Heartofsong83
Oh, dear. The left is always up to this - positing that "independence" consists exclusively of a reflexive opposition to whatever the U.S. policy of the moment happens to be. That is, in fact, the very opposite of independence, it is a slavish dependency on somebody else to define one's own political positions. Those are the politics of someone who can't be bothered to think for himself.
For the world needs both a superpower and it needs a peacekeeper.
The two aren't necessarily exclusive categories. But you can see how neatly one slides into the more moral-sounding "peacekeeper" role as long as somebody else assumes the "superpower" one. This particular role, however, requires what the left has consistently starved in Canada - a strong, well-funded military. During that deliberate starvation period the rhetoric was based around another dichotomy - war-lovers vs. peace-lovers. The reality was an enervated, chronically oppositional government with a voice and absolutely nothing else.
To: Heartofsong83
Is that it's English voice or it's French voice ?
To: Heartofsong83
And Canada can be the peacekeeper
How, by whining impotently about US actions? As an American, Canada barely registers on my radar, but they apparently have some desire to carve out a separate identity by reflexively opposing anything the US does - in this, they appear to be very similar to American leftists.
To: Heartofsong83
Now, increased Canada-U.S. co-operation in Afghanistan, the Mideast conflict and other issues are seen in many parts of the world as eroding Ottawa's role as an honest broker in relations between the White House and countries at odds with U.S. policies. Since when has Canuckistan ever been an honest broker between the US and anybody?
Examples please.
16
posted on
07/27/2006 9:42:02 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." PJO)
To: RexBeach
>>Canada has a "global voice"? News to me.
Yes, it sounds like this: Squeek, squeek, squeek...
To: Alexander Rubin; timsbella
GAG! This is as bad as the $#*^ in the NY Slimes or Washington Pravda!
18
posted on
07/27/2006 11:29:25 AM PDT
by
Convert from ECUSA
(The Arab League jihad continues on like a fart in an elevator - FR American in Israel)
To: CaptainCanada
They got much worse, not better...typical Mr. Dithers as he got into trouble with AdScam so he pandered to the anti-American left...
To: Heartofsong83
I feel the need to remind everyone that the Toronto Star is the paper which is being flaunted on University of Toronto campus to students for 30 cents a copy, marked down from it's newstand price of 75 cents. The Star has hired some desperate kids to walk around and beg people to buy it.
They are so biased they may as well just run the headline "We Hate Jews" on a daily basis.
20
posted on
07/27/2006 12:22:08 PM PDT
by
Catholic Canadian
(Formerly Ashamed Canadian - thank you Stephen Harper!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson