To: D1X1E
I thought we had cut off the welfare spicket for young girls getting pregnant? At least I am under that impression, please correct me if I am wrong. I thought that now you could still receive benefits but you also have to work. At least I hope that is the case.
From reading this all I can gather is we have a bunch of lazy girls who do not want to work for a living.
11 posted on
07/27/2006 7:35:35 AM PDT by
yellowdoghunter
(Vote out the RINO's; volunteer to help get Conservative Republicans elected!)
To: yellowdoghunter
If we have I'm not sure it's a good thing.
I'd far rather the state refrain from promoting abortions. Having something in place for unwed mothers who want to raise their baby ain't in and of itself a bad thing. (Though clearly living with the father should be promoted).
Religious groups should be very active in these situations too as it brings folks into the church.
13 posted on
07/27/2006 7:39:31 AM PDT by
tvguru
To: yellowdoghunter
spigot I hope everyone can forgive me......:) LOL!
29 posted on
07/27/2006 8:01:24 AM PDT by
yellowdoghunter
(Vote out the RINO's; volunteer to help get Conservative Republicans elected!)
To: yellowdoghunter
Work requirements vary state to state. Florida did put a limit on welfare cash assistance increases after a certain number of children who are wholly supported by the state. No limit on foodstamps.
59 posted on
07/28/2006 4:39:49 PM PDT by
D1X1E
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson