Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yellowdoghunter

If we have I'm not sure it's a good thing.

I'd far rather the state refrain from promoting abortions. Having something in place for unwed mothers who want to raise their baby ain't in and of itself a bad thing. (Though clearly living with the father should be promoted).

Religious groups should be very active in these situations too as it brings folks into the church.


13 posted on 07/27/2006 7:39:31 AM PDT by tvguru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: tvguru

Oh yes, I agree. I am all for helping them out but they must finish school and work. Which I really think is the way it is now, at least the working part. In my volunteer activities, some of the mothers receive assistance but they must work also. And I will say, since the new rules went into effect, none of them have gotten pregnant again. All of the sudden, they remembered to go get the patch or shot that last a long time.


17 posted on 07/27/2006 7:42:47 AM PDT by yellowdoghunter (Vote out the RINO's; volunteer to help get Conservative Republicans elected!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: tvguru
I'd far rather the state refrain from promoting abortions.

Me too but let's add - I'd rather the state didn't promote pregnancy by making it a profitable endeavor for these young girls.

This story is about the U.K. but it's no different in the U.S.

20 posted on 07/27/2006 7:47:02 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson