Posted on 07/27/2006 5:55:23 AM PDT by flixxx
Just over a year ago, Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) stood in the way of controversial U.N. ambassador pick John Bolton. The Bush administration worked around Senate opposition by giving Bolton a recess appointment to the job. Now Bolton is back up for Senate confirmation. Michele Kelemen reports
I haven't followed this closely, but Voinovich now supports him and wants to get him confirmed?
What's the outlook on the confirmation? Dems going to fillubuster?
This is baldfaced misleading.
The Senate never even got a chance to VOTE on Bolton, thanks to the weapons of mass obstruction.
1. Just why should what a "former UN bureau chief for the NYT" even be important?
2. Why shouldn't Amb Bolton take another UN Amb to task for disparaging remarks about the US heartland? What we should just accept it as fact and cry "Mia Culpa"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.