First, the "facts in this case" are what were introduced into evidence by the Lawyers? Is that what you think the "facts" are? Her past problems of mental midgetry, and blaming her husband, and post-partum depression, etc., etc., which is the way everyone today tries to analyze and explain away deviant behavior (i.e., bad marriage, bad childhood, bad environment, bad parents, etc., etc.) is why anyone with more than two brain cells can understand that Andrea Yates is the PERPETRATOR, and not a VICTIM.
She will be set free as soon as some "expert psychiatrist" blesses her as being "no danger to society", and she will search one of those Liberal-types out....they're as easy to find as the "expert witnesses" who come up with their laundry list of excuses as to why she should be found "insane".
No doubt she is sick, as was Manson, Gacey, and every other murderer who came down the 'pike.
But, being societal misfits and irresponsible doesn't entitle one to violate the LAW, which is exactly what Yates did: she murdered 3 people, and now every sympathetic politically-correct victimhood supporter is out there trying to rationalize it away....
Sorry, the fact (which you omit) is that she murdered her children, she did it in a planned way, and she now is exonerated by reason of "she's not right upstairs".
Get a grip.
Wow. Not that I can make you hate any more than you already do, but she murdered her 5 children, not 3 children as you stated. Perhaps you are confusing her with someone else? Yes, anyone who murders others and especially anyone who murders children is indeed insane. However, the only hope for these children were the sane people in their life who could have saved them. Their mother was crazy and should not have been responsible for their lives.
Don't worry, that won't happen.