| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 07/25/2006 10:54:45 PM PDT by Lead Moderator, reason:
New thread here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1672353/posts |
Posted on 07/24/2006 10:53:04 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice salutes a US Marine as she walks towards a helicopter upon her departure from Beirut after meeting with Lebanese officials.
Oh it's way worse. Wait until you run into leftist Greg Potemkin, who is about as brilliant at Ward Churchill. He is there to promote his own style of hate with the shia there, (although they certainly have enough of their own). There is also Ali Hussain (or something like that), who appears to have gone over the edge and is probably on a watch list.
Voinovich is on Caviuto. He is backing Bolton. He has seen what those rockets can do. He admits he has changed his views on Bolton, say that he is not sure of what others will do in regard to the vote.We need someone to speak for us at the UN.
at=as
CNN's Robertson Now Admits: Hezbollah 'Had Control' of His Anti-Israel Piece
NewsBusters ^ | July 24 2006 | Rich Noyes
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1671758/posts
Just repeating in case someone else missed it, too. Thanks!
when you lie with dogs...
Well we are giving it our besr shot, some would debate the specifics of troop numbers and strategy, but no one else would even try to advance the MidEast. I remember reading an article titled, "Our World Historical Gamble", think it was TechCentralStation. I thought then as I do now that it is worth it because as long as there is an ideologocally regressive force in the world that has access to wealth, we would never be safe anyway. If we wanted a challenge we sure got it, the MidEast being worse than the Balkans. if we pull this off over the next 5 - 10 years...we'll be up there with the Romans. Of course they were always at war with somone..oh well...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1672073/posts
HUMOR ALERT!! Bill Press is the MOST gullible man :)
This will not bode well for their credibility as they try to solicit future proxies to go up against Israel, or the US for that matter.
They simply MUST act with their national, flagged military forces...even if they lose spectacularly. And they would.
To do less means further isolation...and fewer allies. In fact, they could probably lose a couple of divisions each and preserve their national integrity...and save a little face.
Are they nothing more thatn blustering cowards?!?!?!? :)
BTTT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1672083/posts
Can any of you explain this to me?? I just don't get it.
At the least, Hezebola will fight Israel alone until the awaited international force arrives, giving Hezebola increased political standing within Lebanon as the only party that stood up to Israel.
It's too early to talk about offensive objectives. Too many delicate negotations underway, too many operations underway, in public, I just stick to what's going on right now, and not even all of that.
:-)
Rabbi Yisroel Weiss is saying that Israel brought on all this by antagonizing other countries.
He is so far to the right he is left.
Yes, but without any Soviet on the scene, with the US directly involved on the ground in the Middle East the Syrians can't cuount on the war being stopped when they are up against the ropes. They may actually gamble Damascus this time - are they up to that?
And what would happen to the ruling Baathists?
Saudis have been funding the palis all along, too.
Rabbi Yisroel Weiss is saying that Israel brought on all this by antagonizing other countries.
He is so far to the right he is left.
Thank you so much!
I just woke back up and thought I had to be hallucinating...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.