To: Fedora; Howlin; ravingnutter; piasa; Peach; Grampa Dave; pinz-n-needlez; canadianally; ScaniaBoy; ..
Ping! Gadaffi confirms that Libya's nuke program was very far along - he may be boasting to try to assert Libya's economic and technical prowess, but still I don't think he'd say this if it weren't substantially true and known to the US and UK (because otherwise it could ignite a new round of inquiries if the USA had thought his nuke program weren't so advanced).
So all the questions of how Libya obtained equipment, technology, expertise, and URANIUM still need to be explained in a lot more detail. Why won't the administration cite this more as a dramatic success story in the WOT??
10 posted on
07/24/2006 12:29:32 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Democrats: Trust Nancy Pelosi to Win the War on Terror!! (gag))
To: Enchante
14 posted on
07/24/2006 12:34:50 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: Enchante
"Why won't the administration cite this more as a dramatic success story in the WOT??"
Because when they did over a period of time, nobody gave them credit where credit was due. With all the focus on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Libyian story took second place at best for that short period of time it was even exposure.
16 posted on
07/24/2006 12:45:54 PM PDT by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: Enchante
Thanks for the ping!
This REALLY connects a lot of the dots.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson