Posted on 07/24/2006 8:31:32 AM PDT by Stoat
Children as young as three should be taught about same-sex relationships in a bid to stamp out homophobia in schools, it was claimed yesterday.
The National Union of Teachers, the country's largest teaching union, sparked outrage by demanding that nursery staff help to educate children about gay families.
It claims it is too late to wait until youngsters arrive at primary school to learn about the subject because some three-year-olds are already using homophobic language.
But critics branded the NUT as "achingly politically correct" and said the proposals were akin to "brain-washing" vulnerable youngsters.
The proposal was made yesterday when the NUT published its response to the Department for Education and Skills' Early Years Foundation Stage consultation document.
This government report sets out the "early learning goals" which youngsters should be achieving in the first few years of their lives.
But the NUT claims that it needs to go further and early years teachers should be given "the skills and tools to challenge racism, sexism and homophobia" and abusive language.
The NUT document says: "In the case of homophobia, the use of the word 'gay' is prevalent in primary schools and young boys who are perceived to not conform to masculine stereotypes are at risk of bullying, isolation and social exclusion.
"It is too late to wait until primary school to challenge prejudice and intolerant abusive language.
"The EYFS curriculum needs to alert early years teachers to their responsibilities to challenge gender stereotypes and to challenge language that is negative or prejudiced."
It adds: "It is particularly important to begin to make three to five-year-olds aware of the range of families that exist in the UK today; families with one mum, one mum and dad, two mums, two dads, grandparents, adoptive parents, guardians etc.
"There will be parents who are gay or lesbian who will want to be reassured that their children will be safe in the setting.
"Many gay parents do not 'come out' to their nursery schools because they fear their children will be bullied as a result of the sexual orientation of their parents.
"Now that civil partnerships are legal, nursery settings need to use the curriculum to educate children about all types of families and to promote respect and understanding."
But Nick Seaton, of the Campaign for Real Education, branded the demands as "ridiculous".
He said: "I very much doubt that three-year-olds will be able to grasp the implications of these things anyway.
"Apart from that, even if they do, it seems completely wrong for the state education system to try and brainwash youngsters in this way.
"It is achingly politically correct and it's a sad reflection on the direction state education is taking, with the emphasis on teaching politically correct values, rather than worthwhile subjects."
Hugh McKinney, of the National Family Campaign, added: "To attach any kind of value judgement to the views and statements of three-year-olds is simply nonsense.
"Nobody condones homophobic language but to try and teach impressionable, immature youngsters about issues such as this is simply wrong for their stage of development.
"The state system should not be the basis for such teaching until children are older and more able to form their own judgements."
A spokeswoman for the NUT last night defended educating very young children about gay relationships.
She said: "It's never too early to encourage respect. It's about valuing every child and the relationship they live in and ensuring all children show respect to that relationship as well."
To see what people in the uk think about this idea: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=397008&in_page_id=1770&in_page_id=1770&expand=true#StartComments
I have a 4-yr old and 5-yr old in state school in England and I doubt any of the parents around here would stand for this nonsense.
I have a 4-yr old and 5-yr old in state school in England and I doubt any of the parents around here would stand for this nonsense.
I initially saw those comments and I didn't post them or link to them here because when it comes to the Teacher's Unions, my experience has been that it is utterly irrelevant what the public or the parents say or want....the agenda of the Union will be forced down their throats regardless. Examples in the USA include forced busing to achieve "racial equality" in schools ( a dismal failure, millions of lives disrupted and never an apology from the Unions after decades of use), "Guess and Go Spelling"- an attempt to dumb-down the rigors of spelling education in order to make it easier on teachers....a dismal failure and we have millions of lousy spellers as a result.... "Mainstreaming" problem students (putting slow and / or disruptive children in with normal and bright kids and teaching the entire class at the very lowest level....still done today and it's responsible for millions of bright kids getting completely bored and fed up with Education).... the list goes on and on. The Teachers Unions and the Left (all the same, actually) are constantly experimenting on other people's kids, usually with the goal of making it simpler for the teachers and providing less opportunity to rate an individual teacher on their ability or competence, and usually with dreadful results for the children. ALL of these insane and obviously worthless plans have been bitterly opposed by parents (and the saner teachers) all along, but to no avail. The Unions are too powerful and they have shut parents out of the loop....and that's the way they like it...
BTTT.
I'm sorry but I'm not in the U.K....I'm a proud American stoat :-)
If you can't find the answer to your question by doing a web search, perhaps others here might like to answer your question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.