Posted on 07/22/2006 3:35:54 PM PDT by blam
Britain criticises Israeli tactics
Ned Temko in London, Conal Urquart in Tel Aviv and Peter Beaumont in Beirut
Saturday July 22, 2006
Guardian Unlimited
A family flee their home in southern Lebanon. Photograph: Kevin Frayer/AP
Britain has dramatically broken ranks with George Bush over the Lebanon crisis, publicly criticising Israel's military tactics and urging the Americans to 'understand' the price being paid by ordinary Lebanese civilians.
The remarks, made in Beirut today by the Foreign Office Minister, Kim Howells, were the first public criticism of the US voiced by Britain. The Observer can also reveal that Tony Blair urged restraint in a private telephone convseration with the Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, last week.
Sources close to the Prime Minister said that Olmert replied that Israel faced a dire security threat from the Hizbollah militia and was determined to do everything necessary to defeat it.
Britain's policy shift came as Israeli tanks and warplanes pounded targets across the border in south Lebanon today ahead of an immenently expected ground offensive to clear out nearby Hizbollah positions which have been firing dozens of rockets onto towns and cities inside Israel. Downing Street sources said Blair still believed Israel had every right to respond to the missile threat, and held the Shia militia responsible for provoking the cirisis by abducting two Israeli soldiers and shelling Israel.
But they said they had no quarrel with Howells's scathing denunciation of Israel's military tactics. Speaking to a BBC reporter before travelling on for talks in Israel, where he will also visit missile-hit areas of Haifa and meet his Israeli opposite-number, Howell said: 'The destruction of the infrastructure, the death of so many children and so many people. These have not been surgical strikes. If they are chasing Hizbollah, then go for Hizbollah.
(Excerpt) Read more at observer.guardian.co.uk ...
Notice, also, that no Israeli civilians have been killed, only Israelis.
I assume he must be talking about the firing of rockets by hizzbu-allah at random into Israeli cities.
Any country in this world should kmow that when they allow attacks upon other countries from their own soil, that they are sending out invitations to be attacked themselves.
Pitiful! The stupid are pitiful. They wail over their own stupidity.
What the Guardian is REALLY saying is
"The remarks, made in Beirut today by the Foreign Office Minister, Kim Howells, were the first public criticism of the US voiced by Britain."
Mr. Howells' remarks don't seem to coincide
with 10 Downing Street. But we aren;'t told
THAT until much deeper into the article!
Obviously, Keller and Siegel of the NYT
cut their teeth on reading the Guardian!
Love the Brits, but they weren't overly concerned about civilian causalties during WWII. What's the difference? This time, it's Jews defending themselves.
And just how do they purpose to do that? Idiots. Never have a solution just how to do it, but always has a complaint.
im sorry, i hate hezbollah as much as the next person, but not just because its israel does it mean that everything they do is always right. things arent always black or white. today a christian man was killed, he was working at a television relay station for a christian tv network. a civil defense building was destroyed killing more than 10 people all civil defense workers who are supposed to give aid to refugees and go to bomb targets and save lives etc.. also the other day after they bombed the power plant in the south they bombed an army barracks that houses an army logistics unit whose job is to repair electricity lines. they also bombed a bus full of people fleeing the country.
Are you telling me that hezbollah were to blame for all these?
Normandy, 1944. The British assault on the French city of Caen:
Yes, hezzbollah are responsible for all that, as they started all this. For how long should the Israelis put up with the attacks of the sand nazi's?
"...but not just because its israel does it mean that everything they do is always right."
Is everything Israel does right? No, however the world leans in the opposite direction. EVERYTHING Israel does is wrong, end of story, according to them. Why doesn't the world scream out loud about Israels' enemies tactics of mounting their attacks with innocent civilians around? If someone is shooting rockets at me and I have the weapons I sure as hell will fire back EVEN if the enemy is in the midst of civilians. This is what Israels enemies do. That way when Civilians die when Israel returns fire, the other side can shout ATROCITY. Terrorists play the media angle to the hilt, they're very good at it
I know that the Christian militas were decimated in the Lebanese Civil War, but why can't the Christians start another one right now. After all we don't want the Hezbollah, Syrians, Iranians, etc in charge of Lebanon after the Israelis leave once again?
That "christian" man should have been fighting hezbollah, not working on a TV antennae.
Someone's crying, lord, Hezbolla. Someone's crying, lord, Hezbolla. Someone's crying, lord, Hezbolla, O lord, Hezbolla.
Someone's dyin' lord, Hezbolla. Someone's dyin' lord, Hezbolla. Someone's dyin' lord, Hezbolla. O lord, Hezbolla.
I'm looking real far down inside for some kind of sympathy for Hez, and the people who support it, but, no, nothing there.
I doubt if there are any "innocent civilians" in Lebonon.
Then these people need to get the heck out of the war zone.
How many German civilians do you think we killed in our bombings in ww2. How many Nip civilians when we dropped the two glow-bombs in japland?
The lebbies should have done something about the hezbollah before it came to this.. if they couldn't then they should have called in help.
The rent's due. Tough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.