US earmarks billions for new bomber

Herald Sun ^ | 21 July 2006

[Quix]

It was clear from his pics that it was THAT SMALL.

But he did not go into details about the issues you mentioned. He did mention that shielding was a problem but, if my memory is accurate, evidently not as terminal a problem as some might suspect. Again, he didn't elaborate.

My impression was that he treaded secrecy lines very carefully though quite confidently and almost nonchalantly.

There are a few rumors that some of the ET craft use nuke engines--though that seems to conflict with the zero-point energy engines most supposedly run on.

[prophetic]

I wish I could tell you some of the stuff I've seen down here in Florida, but you may think its off the deep end

Anyways for starters there's a certain small aircraft I call the delta flyer with a 20 ft wingspan that I've seen for at least 8 years now. I've seen this black 'aircraft' loitering around at low altitude that you'd think its a large bird and then within moments it gets up to speeds of over 900mph and cross miles of sky within 5 seconds. I've observed it at altitudes from 400ft to over 15,000 ft.

And there are many other instances; since I first observed it back in 1998 or earlier there are several other types I've cataloged.....

[Quix]

No trouble believing you at all.

I forget the areas in FL that are supposed to be hot beds of such sightings.

Will FREEPMAIL you shortly.

[DesScorp]

"Despite the protestations in the article I'm betting it will be unmanned."

If they're smart, it will be. The age of manned combat aircraft is drawing to a close. Even today's fighters like the F-16 are capable of better performance, but are limited by human factors, such as G tolerance. An unmanned aircraft doesn't have that problem, and satellite controls are already good enough to steer them remotely at long distances, as Global Hawk has proved. The only problem is with the software that would be involved...it will inevitably be the biggest source of problems.

[Quix]

I'm expecting a more or less surprise meteor storm to sweep all satellites out of the skies in our era. Could complicate a lot of things.

[brazzaville]

Good evening.
"I would like to see the U.S. build a fleet of at least 8,000 bombers that are triple the wingspan of the B-52, can travel around the world three times without refueling and that can drop over 800 two-ton bombs."

How about several satellites with lasers and Google Earth Plus?

Michael Frazier

[DesScorp]

"What is your source/authority for these comments on the B-1B bomber?"

I work in Aviation, with ex-Air Force guys, and Air National Guard Viper drivers (who have experience around Bone crews). I've never heard of a problem with the swing-wings. The Zoomies tell me the problem is with those damn intake baffles we put on the B model to make them "stealthier". They're serpentine shaped, and that's what limits the top speed to Mach 1.3; they tell me this has caused problems operating about 28,000 ft or so. Boeing has proposed a new build model of the Bone that removes the baffles and restores a top Mach 2 speed, and gives those hungry GE F101's the airflow they need.

And please....making a bomber out of the Raptor is just stupid. They've already tacked on attack capability to it, but a dedicated bomber? That's just a damn excuse to get more funding for the whole Raptor program, which Congress hates. USAF chafes at the fact that they'll never get over 189 of their new sports cars.

[donmeaker]

I agree. I was on the flight test program.

[NicknamedBob]

Again I guess I could see a motive force that small, but for power it would have to be coupled to dynamos. At the time, superconducting generators would not have been available, so he must have been talking about outboard devices.

Intriguing.

[uglybiker]

Think BIG!

[maro]

How about a fleet of unmanned bombers based on the moon?

[brazzaville]

Good evening.
"It was clear from his pics that it was THAT SMALL."

Could it be the Holy Grail, controlled fusion?

Imagine the effect on the world's economic structure.

Michael Frazier

[NicknamedBob]

From the supplied hints, it wasn't fusion. If cold fusion could be made to work, it could be made that small, but it wouldn't be that powerful.

Think of a design that involves skirting the edge of excursion. A little whiplash from the dragon's tail.

[COEXERJ145]

The B-36 is one of the coolest bombers ever designed.

Sadly there are only a few left in existence.

[Quix]

Think of a design that involves skirting the edge of excursion. A little whiplash from the dragon's tail.
= = = =

I'm far from a physcist . . . but reading that and reflecting on other things I've read . . . it appears that you are either very well read or have some inside information or are an extremely good extrapolator.

And I can't even articulate why I'm convinced of that but I'm very convinced of that.

[brazzaville]

Good evening.
"A little whiplash from the dragon's tail."

Nice phrase. Fire away, I'm ready.

Good night, all.

Michael Frazier

[NicknamedBob]

No inside information. I'll go with the well-read and good extrapolator explanation.

Thanks!

[Quix]

Actually, he alluded to NUKE engines MUCH smaller than that. And, there were some hints that some are deployed but I'm sure if he were queried about those hints he could have immediately denied them. I don't recall what they were specifically. I didn't take many notes.

My impression--and I don't know where it comes from in all this--my impression is that the power was immediately electricity and that the electricity powers very exotic UFO types of dynamics, technologies.

I have long had a hunch with scant verification from few puzzle pieces that the radiation aspect of nuclear technologies has been overblown. I don't know whether we or ET's shared technologies to minimize the problems but that those problems have been minimized.

As I understand it--much of my impression from extrapolation from very subtle and tiny bits of puzzle pieces; the oligarchy has not found it in THEIR interest for the general public to think that there are essentially no serious unsolved problems with having cheap nuclear generated electricity.

I believe that nuclear waste can be reduced by more than 95% in volume to what it routinely currently is.

[B-Chan]

My guess (based upon years of research, plus things I've seen and heard personally over the years) is that there are agencies within the federal government so secret that even the President and DoD don't know about them: their funding separate and unaccounted, their personnel sequestered and elite, their missions and ultimate ends unknown.

If I could have one wish (other than "to be a good Christian"), it would be to know the darkest secret in the world.

[Quix]

I don't really recall if I've ever come across puzzle pieces that hinted whether it was fusion or more conventional nuclear processes. I wouldn't be that surprised either way.

My impression is that the magnetic technologies the ET craft afforded us--whether reverse engineered or via directly taught/given technologies--that the magnetic technologies could readily be used to contain all manner of things and forces. Perhaps fusion it is. I just don't know at all.

I have never been able to resolve via any individual or collection of puzzle pieces the seeming contradiction between deployed nuclear engines vs zero-point/free energy engines using energies inherent in the quantum levels of reality.

I'm pretty well convinced that the latter are true in 2-3 DIFFERENT ways. I accept, having watched Stanton Friedman's presentation in March 06, that it is highly likely that the rumors of our having UFO type craft with nuclear engines in them--that that's also true. Why both is beyond even my puzzle piece collection and very risky extrapolations or even guided flights of fancy.