Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NicknamedBob

It was clear from his pics that it was THAT SMALL.

But he did not go into details about the issues you mentioned. He did mention that shielding was a problem but, if my memory is accurate, evidently not as terminal a problem as some might suspect. Again, he didn't elaborate.

My impression was that he treaded secrecy lines very carefully though quite confidently and almost nonchalantly.

There are a few rumors that some of the ET craft use nuke engines--though that seems to conflict with the zero-point energy engines most supposedly run on.


61 posted on 07/20/2006 9:12:31 PM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Quix

Again I guess I could see a motive force that small, but for power it would have to be coupled to dynamos. At the time, superconducting generators would not have been available, so he must have been talking about outboard devices.

Intriguing.


69 posted on 07/20/2006 9:28:10 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Mom said to call a spade a spade. Dad taught me what to call it when you trip over it in the shed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Quix
Good evening.
"It was clear from his pics that it was THAT SMALL."

Could it be the Holy Grail, controlled fusion?

Imagine the effect on the world's economic structure.

Michael Frazier
72 posted on 07/20/2006 9:38:05 PM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson