Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muir_redwoods

Laws banning cohabitation existed, I would expect, in every state in the union in early America. They existed long before the Nanny State. The Nanny State was brought to us by people like the ACLU, who applauded the court for striking down the cohabitation law.

If you're a conservative, where would you rather live in terms of the current government and political atmosphere: Sweden or South Carolina? HINT: There's not the chance of a snowball in hell of a law against fornication passing in Sweden.


142 posted on 07/21/2006 5:32:40 AM PDT by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: puroresu
Laws banning cohabitation existed, I would expect, in every state in the union in early America.

In the USA we've allowed our zealots to operate under the 'victorian compromise'.. -- IE, you can have your blue laws [and even occasionally enforce them - on the lower sorts] as long as you let the rest of us pursue life & liberty.

Banning 'cohabitation' is, in this case, interfering with liberty.

149 posted on 07/21/2006 6:13:35 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: puroresu
"If you're a conservative, where would you rather live in terms of the current government and political atmosphere: Sweden or South Carolina?"

I would rather live in freedom which neither of the examples you gave adequately respect.

Who my neighbor sleeps with is none of my business so long as both are of the age of consent. There is a virtue in minding one's own business.

196 posted on 07/21/2006 2:23:38 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson