[mjaneangels@aolcom]

The theories on this thread that really amaze me are the ones that say that if you take a human male and combine it with a human female, you get a non-human, but somewhere else along the way, that non-human becomes a human.

And they accuse us of being religious not scientific.

Let me know if any of them have an explanation. I would really like to hear it.

[do the dhue]

take a human male and combine it with a human female, you get a non-human, but somewhere else along the way, that non-human becomes a human.

Duuuude, I tried to explain it to you. It is just like when the Ape skipped over to evolving into a human man.

Just joking, man.

It's simple math to me. If you have an Human egg alone, there is no human life. If you have a human sperm without an egg, it's just a sperm. Mix the two together and you have a human being. I don't believe it is possible for that life to grow into anything but human (in my example here). Therefore, I think when you mix the two, you have life right then and there. It can not become anything but a human, therefor it is.

Now, can you explain to me why a liberal will tie itself to a tree to save the Spotted Owl's egg, but they won't tie themselves to a abortion clinic? Go me, man.

[ohioWfan]

Modern 'science' requires a lot of magic, mjane.

It's one of the great religions of the world.........only none of its worshipers admit it.