To: mjaneangels@aolcom
take a human male and combine it with a human female, you get a non-human, but somewhere else along the way, that non-human becomes a human.
Duuuude, I tried to explain it to you. It is just like when the Ape skipped over to evolving into a human man.
Just joking, man.
It's simple math to me. If you have an Human egg alone, there is no human life. If you have a human sperm without an egg, it's just a sperm. Mix the two together and you have a human being. I don't believe it is possible for that life to grow into anything but human (in my example here). Therefore, I think when you mix the two, you have life right then and there. It can not become anything but a human, therefor it is.
Now, can you explain to me why a liberal will tie itself to a tree to save the Spotted Owl's egg, but they won't tie themselves to a abortion clinic? Go me, man.
605 posted on
07/19/2006 10:20:05 PM PDT by
do the dhue
(I hope y'all will help bail me out of jail after I dot Sean Pean's eyes.)
To: do the dhue
"It's simple math to me. If you have an Human egg alone, there is no human life. If you have a human sperm without an egg, it's just a sperm. Mix the two together and you have a human being. I don't believe it is possible for that life to grow into anything but human (in my example here). Therefore, I think when you mix the two, you have life right then and there. It can not become anything but a human, therefor it is."
I think that you and I are on the same page here.
"Now, can you explain to me why a liberal will tie itself to a tree to save the Spotted Owl's egg, but they won't tie themselves to a abortion clinic? Go me, man."
Please don't ask me to explain liberals. I don't understand them myself.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson