Posted on 07/18/2006 12:46:21 AM PDT by rebel_yell2
I think just getting a ride out of Lebanon. But I don't know -- that's just a guess.
Yesterday I posted on one of the threads that since the State Department waived the extraction fee mandated by law and voted for by Nancy Pelosi (despite her saying that she thought it was a terrible law - LOL) that I thought a lot of people would take advantage of the loosened requirements and come here just to get out of Lebanon. And then go to their home country from the safety of the USA.
I think that what's upsetting is you seem to think that anyone who wishes rebelyell2 the best wishes
MUST be Pro-France - Anti Israel - Anti US
I read were rebel stated he is 100% for Israel
rebel stated he wants to see Hizoblaah , Syria & Iran destroyed
Yes , I do believe rebel said he was upset at the blockade , & felt he was being held hostage .
I think rebel was in a horrible situation , & didn't get much sleep . If i was in Lebanon I would have TONS of Complaints .
I just don't think that those statements he made should have Freepers wanted his death !
Rebel has been told by many Freepers that since he is on vacation he Deserves what he gets .
I Just wanted to let some freepers know , that Americans do have to be in Arab countries due to helping our gov't .
Can a freeper love Israel & the Usa BUT Still have concerns & compliants ?????
When the dems were in power I was OUTRAGED about alot of stuff that was happening ! I Complained to EVERYONE about Clinton , & I Still Love the USA !
If you're trying to imply that you ever got a freepmail from me, you're a liar. Typically I avoid you like the plague.
And if you're reading comprehension is so bad that you can't see that Biker Barb lied on the open forum on this thread for all to see, you need to get help for that. But that you're supporting her with your snide little insinuations doesn't surprise me at all. It's SOP for you.
Whatever was said, and I am not reading the whole thread, did not deserve a banning as I have seen others say much the same thing on this thread on the parts I have read and they are still here.
Anyway, continue to avoid me, I didn't post to you first as you will notice. Plus, the name calling you do, rewording people's FRnames, is pretty pathetic but typical for you.
She asked you several times about your post #904 where you threw out the accusation that "some freepers haven't got a single solitary Christian bone" to many one who has no Christian beliefs is going to burn in hell- that is where she got that connection. Why she felt you were directing that at her personally, I don't know. That doesn't make her a liar- the fact that she took it literally and personally for whatever reason does not make her a liar.
.#2: My first post on this thread was at #894 to Rebel_Yell2. Byker Babs responded to that post and said that freepers were appalled by Rebel's posts because (and it sounded like) some freepers are sending their sons and daughters to rescue him (#894). I asked her to point out which freepers had family involved in extraction efforts; she didn't respond.
Many people with ties to the military, including me- took exception to posts about the military being slow-second guessing their tactics, etc- bykrbayb may have been under the impression that many had loved ones directly involved, being mistaken does not make one a liar- if it does I guess in post #897 where you stated rebel_yell2 was involved with the IDF- tell me, does that mean you were mistaken or does it mean you are a liar? Which is it Peach?
At post #910, Byker Babs said I've chosen freepers to burn in hell. It's relatively easy to read between my first post at #894 and #910 to see that I never said anything even close to that. So then I called her a liar because it is a lie.
See above- could she be mistaken? Or is she a liar? Did she take your post literally, and take it to heart?
Byker Babs said I was stalking her; not to be picky or anything (LOL) but she posted to me first. Kind of hard to justify her stalking charge but it's clear this freeper doesn't mind lying.
I have no knowledge of whether or not you are stalking her- again could she be mistaken- or is she a liar? If she thinks you are stalking her and you aren't- that doesn't make her a liar.
Now you're asking me what Biker Babs has to do with you. You are the one who asked in #1125 if I was going to get you banned too (a direct reference to Biker Babs) and again referenced that banned poster in #1143.
I have already explained the reason I said that- but it has nothing to do with the other questions you are asking me here about bykrbayb- how do all these other questions you are asking me about her relate to me?
You must have missed Post #994 where someone outright told Byker Babs they were hitting the abuse button. And you must have missed where the mods told Biker Babs to stop and she argued with them.
I did not miss that at all, I never said you reported her, I explained to you already what I thought your involvement was in the banning.
3) Then in #1128, I clearly said you weren't lying about Rebel. Then I said it again in #1139. But that wasn't good enough for you. You kept posting you weren't going to let me get away with saying that you'd lied.
You posted directly to me, that freepers were lying-yet you have posted no proof that freepers were lying- remember the difference between mistaken, and lying? I asked you to state directly that I had not lied to or about the poster rebel or to post proof that I did do so, because some did get the impression you were referring to me. You have not stated I did not lie to or about rebel, or offer proof that I did so; you have only said you did not call me a liar. Very different.
4) I answered the "you all" question several times now, despite your saying I didn't. (#1158, #1171, #1173).
You have yet to tell me who "you all" is. It is obvious you were lumping me in with other posters- so name names Peach- who is "you all?"
When you admit you're wrong that I haven't answered your questions previously, we can discuss this further. This post pretty clearly reflects that I've responded to you numerous times about your "questions". Until then, have a great day.
I do not admit to being wrong, because I am not wrong, you have not answered my questions as I pointed out above. You used and are still using very strong language calling freepers liars and accusing them of not having a Christian bone in their body, yet you have not offered any proof of either. Remember- being mistaken is not the same as lying. I have work to do- but if you still think I have not answered your questions, let me know and I will as soon as I can.
Don't tell me what I seem to think, you don't have a clue. Post to me about what I posted, not what you think is in my mind. In fact through this whole thread I personally have only had the best wishes for rebel, and his safety at all times.
Don't you start with me, you are posting to me about what other posters said on this thread. Why are you doing that?
I am only responsible for my own posts; thank you very much. Do not use this tactic to make it look as though I said these things- you know very well I did not.
Put up or shut up- quote the freepers you are referring to and post to them about it. Leave me out of it. You may post to me about my posts, I will not answer for anyone else.
#1: This was her post: Is it safe to assume that those of us who are praying for Rebel's safety, and pointing out that he's wrong to blame Israel and the USA, are the ones you have chosen to burn in hell?
When I asked her to point out where I said anyone was going to burn in hell, she couldn't respond. She made the charge that I said something I didn't say. That's a lie. You can spin it all you wish. It's still a lie.
#2. Taking exception to a post and saying outright that freepers have family members involved in the extraction are two different thing. I asked her who was involved in the extraction (so I could thank those freepers). You can spin that any way you wish too, but she clearly didn't respond to my question.
Re the stalking charge -- LOLOL regarding your response. I'm either stalking someone or I'm not. I don't remember even speaking with this freeper since maybe last year. Maybe once this year. Maybe. And since I didn't address her first, it makes the stalking charge a lie as well.
I had zero involvement in her banning, as you well know. And if you think your explanation carries any water, that I tried to anger her, you're dead wrong. If you think a poster can lie about something and expect not to be challenged, maybe you're on the wrong forum.
#3: Already answered in my previous post. That you don't get it is your problem. As to other freepers lying about Rebel, that's been answered as well in posts on this thread. Freepers said he complained about having to pay for extraction -- I pointed out post after post where he said he didn't mind paying. There are other examples, but since you don't read them or comprehend them, there's no point. You just keep saying that I haven't explained how other freepers have lied about Rebel when anyone reading this thread can see that's just not true.
#4. Wow. Asked and answered at least 4 times now.
Clearly you don't live in reality. You're on ignore.
yellowdoghunter - I did send someone an inappropriate freepmail once and I profusely apologized for it to the freeper on the open forum. And, not that facts seem to be your forte, I was suspended for that freepmail, so there goes your little "preferred freeper" theory right out the window.
And what was said by the suspended freeper was so aggregious that the mods asked her to stop and she argued with them. And, btw, she was told on the open forum upthread that someone was pressing abuse on her. So there goes that little theory.
And whose name have I messed up? BikerBarbs? I can't even remember how to spell it but if you think that's insulting, you have a very thin skin.
You Said " If you think France is truly our friend, right now today- I disagree. If you think France has not been snuggling with terrorists- I disagree with that too; but you are entitled to your opinion."
I do NOT like France , & you are accusing me of liking France .
So , I am not telling you what I Think YOU are trying to tell ME what i Think
Posted by rebel_yell2 to RouxStir
On News/Activism 07/20/2006 2:56:40 AM PDT · 216 of 1,075
Just had to make one quick comment. I heard only about ten people out of 900 speak English on the ship (okay I didn't talk to ALL 900). Many didn't have U.S. passports (They had to get in a line to register, a LONG line). These were not Americans who live in the U.S. and many were not citizens. Arabic was the language of choice; even shipboard announcements were done in Arabic and English.
I'm glad rebelyell took the time to let us know what was happening to him ;)
Tammy8 Post #888
I am not convinced this is real, I am having 2nd thoughts about this being true, mostly because he does seem more interested in blaming and ranting than in solutions. Not once has he said maybe he should have made other choices- or acted as though he felt like he was at all responsible for his own well being
Tammy you did say you THOUGHT rebel may be lieing.
Your quote:Tammy you did say you THOUGHT rebel may be lieing.
I said I was not convinced and was having 2nd thoughts, I never said he was lieing, or that I thought he may be lieing. Not being convinced is not being convinced. Period, just as I said it. 2nd thoughts means doubt, not that I was convinced either way.
I said exactly what I meant to say and not what you think I meant to say or what you want others to think I meant to say. Big difference, now you are either mistaken or lieing about what I said or meant or whatever.
Do not put words in my mouth, and quit trying to read my mind- you are bad at it.
Wrong- I said "IF" meaning if you think that way...
I said just what I meant to say. If you don't think that way- then what I said must not apply to you.
Do you understand?
Tammy8 said :
I am not convinced this is real, I am having 2nd thoughts about this being true
So what does that above statement mean ?
rebel was telling the truth ?
rebel is lieing ?
Means exactly what it says: I was not convinced and was having second thoughts.
It means no more and means no less than that and I already answered this once. Perhaps you did not understand, hopefully now you do.
Also, why on earth if he was of such UN importance was he online "here" when he'd be online or should have been more concerned with reachign the "UN" or the USA embassy through other channels? Sounds strange to me as many many of you are gullible.
Ha! Ha! Just kidding, total sarcasm. Everyone, well most everyone, is entitled to their opinion. Plus, me hitting the abuse would not carry any of the same weight as others.
Also, thanks for your service to our great country!
Sounds strange to me as many many of you are gullible.
Well, it's just too bad for us that you, the superior and wise fellow that you are, didn't get here when the thread was posted so that you could save us all from our gullibility. We just oughtta call you Superman.
I'll be honest. I don't like the superior, all-knowing tone of your posts. You're just as obnoxious as Bykrbabe. Don't expect a response from me if you post to me again. I wish you well in whatever it is that you do. [I tried to address this to Bykr Babe since I mentioned her, but apparently she's been deleted.]
You do bray a lot, don't you?
There you go again, acting like the "innocent little ole me". A routine that is getting old. You do it on purpose and it is childish.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.