That's why I'm hesitant. I have a good understanding of the gist of the article, though. Bottom line, is it brag or fact?
We have the two above translations above- do they square at all with what you gleaned?
Thanks:)
From the machine translations, it seems Nasrallah is saying that they have the capability to generate casualties "equivalent" to that of a nuclear weapon by targeting the petrochemical facilities in Haifa (major toxic chemical release).
Machine translations are hard to read.
Nasrallah is not known for excessive bluster. He tends to deliver on his threats. This may be one of the "surprises" he referenced earlier.