Gingrich says it's World War III

Seattle Times ^ | July 15, 2006 | David Postman

[goodnesswins]

DUH!

[DarthVader]

Gingrich says it's World War III!

So do I.

[NinoFan]

He said Bush needs to deliver a speech to Congress and "connect all the dots" for Americans.

Couldn't agree more.

[GOPJ]

The message then, he said, is "'OK, if we're in the third world war, which side do you think should win?"

Ask Keller ... the American people need to know his answer.

[TheLion]

I love Newt!

[tomzz]

The thing I'm having the really impossible time trying to picture is how FDR or Ike might have tried to fight WW-II while buying oil from Adolf Hitler for 75 dollars a barrel.

We need to ban the importation of oil. It would mess us up about as badly as we were messed up during WW-II for about a year, after which we'd be vastly better off, and it would utterly ruin all of the world's worst ****heads permanently.

[JLAGRAYFOX]

Newt is right on the money. And.....GW Bush better level with the American people. As of today, the USA is never going to be in a better position to take on Iran, Syria and North Korea. GW will be surprised that the overwhelming majority of the American electorate will back him to the maximum.

[rintense]

I think any American with common sense knows this already, ie those who live in the red states. The only people who need the dots connected are liberals, and it still won't be enough to convince them. In fact, if Bush did address a joint session of congress as Newt says, liberals would be all over him as a fear monger.

There are those who know this already and those who have their head in the sand. They will never come around until a major US city is destroyed. By then, they will blame Bush for not stopping it when they are the ones who are truly to blame.

[GOPJ]

bump

[familyop]

Some say that Gingrich would be a poor choice, because the feminists and other libertines of the left dislike him so much. But he would get the conservative Republican vote and the votes of many liberal men, who are fed-up with Hillary's policies.

[garyhope]

I agree and have been trying to tell my friends and relatives this for a long time. They won't listen.

It's the left and the Islamofascists against America and Western civilization.

[JLAGRAYFOX]

And....Newt may be our next President, hopefully. America always produces a "man for the moment" and Newt is looking more and more like "The Man"!!!

[conservativecorner]

Even Ray Charles could see that we are in a World War with the "Religion of Peace".

[operation clinton cleanup]

Gingrich said in the coming days he plans to speak out publicly, and to the Administration, about the need to recognize that America is in World War III.

Does he have a book coming out soon?

[Arizona Carolyn]

Me, too. I see he's running third in the Freeper election poll behind McCain and Guliani... he's running #1 with me..

[nickcarraway]

Isn't there some adultery waiting to be committed?

[poindexter]

A question for armchair strategists out there: What if the Arab world plays it's strongest card, which is an oil embargo? I have not seen this possibility addressed.

[Tall_Texan]

"'OK, if we're in the third world war, which side do you think should win?"

Sadly, we already know who the libs and the media wants to see win.

[TWohlford]

It's WWIV. WWIII was the Cold War.