To: Jeff Head
Well, what do we really know?
At this point we know a missile was fired. The ship sustained some damage (at least a temporary mission kill), and four sailors appear to be dead.
So what happened? In all likelihood, this ship did not sustain a serious hit. I say this because of the low loss of life and no serious fire damage. Even a dud would produce more if it entered the superstructure.
A substantial blow to the hull (hammer blow or explosive) can lead to a mission kill. Electronic systems get knocked offline.
If the hit was in the stern, it may have detonated external after a glancing blow. The bow or stern are least sensitive areas of even a small ship. Or if oblique enough for a CIWS engagement, the missile may have detonated close in, or come apart and hit the ship as a grab bag of components.
A ship of this size does not take an ASCM into its bowels and return under its own power.
So I postulate that the missile did not penetrate the main structure of the ship.
To: SampleMan
What do we know?
We now know that the Iranians are in Lebanon, and they're willing to bring their toys along with them.
151 posted on
07/15/2006 7:11:57 PM PDT by
Klutz Dohanger
(Folding - Help science, as you browse the web. Team#36120)
To: SampleMan; Jeff Head
"At this point we know a missile was fired. The ship sustained some damage (at least a temporary mission kill), and four sailors appear to be dead. So what happened? In all likelihood, this ship did not sustain a serious hit. I say this because of the low loss of life and no serious fire damage. Even a dud would produce more if it entered the superstructure." Light to moderate damage would hint at the Israeli ship's Phalanx scoring a kill against the missile...but close to the ship.
158 posted on
07/15/2006 7:31:39 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson