I gotta get me one of those electric cars so I can plug it into the power plant and tell idiots that I am saving the planet.
Posted on 07/15/2006 1:40:41 PM PDT by calcowgirl
The EV1 may be dead and buried, but the electric car that once roamed California freeways is still haunting General Motors Corp.
The Detroit auto giant is the reluctant "star" of the biting documentary "Who Killed the Electric Car?" which chronicles one fateful slice of California's effort to force automakers to develop cleaner vehicles for the state's smog-afflicted residents.
The film, which opened in limited release last month, takes aim at several major automakers including Ford Motor Co., Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. But GM receives by far the worst bashing for its decision to terminate the EV1 despite what the filmmakers contend was widespread consumer demand.
The film contends that electric cars marketed in California by GM and other automakers had the potential to radically change the way that Americans drive. The cars, a response to the state's 1990 mandate that 10% of vehicles offered in California be emission-free by 2003, were peppy, quiet, nonpolluting and required virtually no maintenance.
During the 1990s, GM produced about 1,000 EV1s — which, like most electric car models, were available only by lease. California backed off its zero-emission mandate in 2003 after the auto industry, led by GM, sued. The automakers began systematically recalling their electric vehicles — often against customers' wishes — and, in many cases, shipping them to the car crusher.
GM contends that it ended its money-losing electric car program because of a lack of interest from consumers, who were put off by the EV1's limited range and problems with the battery packs in early models.
GM can take solace from the movie's modest box-office take so far. Despite a respectable per-screen average of about $5,600, it had grossed only $164,000 in eight theaters through last weekend... The film cost about $1.2 million to make.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
It's a conspiracy. Quick, we need to make a movie called "Who Killed 'Who Killed the Electric Car?'"
I gotta get me one of those electric cars so I can plug it into the power plant and tell idiots that I am saving the planet.
...maybe because i was a money-losing electric car program?
i = it
The movie is weak, even as a propaganda piece.
Here is GM's response:
___________________________________________________
GM'S FORWARD PROGRESS: FACTS VERSUS FICTION.
June 23, 2006: Who Ignored the Facts About the Electric Car? By Dave Barthmuss GM Communications
Who Ignored the Facts About the Electric Car?
By Dave Barthmuss GM Communications
The film EV Confidential: Who Killed the Electric Car? showcased the intense passion for GM's out-of-production EV1 electric vehicle. I understand why. It was great technology for its day, a great concept and a great car. GM was and is proud to have brought the electric vehicle concept as far as it did and further than any other electric vehicle project attempted by any other automaker around the globe. Sadly, despite the substantial investment of money and the enthusiastic fervor of a relatively small number of EV1 drivers - including the filmmaker - the EV1 proved far from a viable commercial success.
But the story for GM does not end with the final credits on the movie. I've been the person who has spent the last few years answering the questions of why GM discontinued the program. Although I have not seen the movie or received an advanced DVD as others have from the film's producers, I can tell you that based on what I have heard there may be some information that the movie did not tell its viewers. The good news for electric car enthusiasts is that although the EV1 program did not continue, both the technology and the GM engineers who developed it did. In fact, the technology is very much alive, has been improved and carried forward into the next generation of low-emission and zero-emission vehicles that are either on the road, in development or just coming off the production line. For example:
GM's two-mode hybrid system designed for transit busses have been placed in more than 35 cities across the U.S. and Canada. Perhaps many have seen these cleaner-burning diesel-electric mass transit vehicles. The buses use technology developed for the EV1, such as the regenerative braking system.
The Saturn Vue Green Line, which will hit showrooms later this summer, incorporates a new, more affordable gas-electric technology. The Saturn Vue Green Line will be priced at less than $23,000 and offer the highest highway fuel economy at 32 mpg of any SUV, hybrid or otherwise.
GM is co-developing with DaimlerChrysler and BMW Group a new two-mode hybrid system for passenger vehicles. This new two-mode hybrid technology will debut next year in a Chevrolet Tahoe full-size SUV, which will offer a 25 percent improvement in combined city and highway fuel economy when joined with other GM fuel-saving technologies. Technology born in the EV1 is incorporated into this new two-mode hybrid system.
GM's fourth-generation hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, which enhances the technology found in today's HydroGen3 fuel cell vehicle, (currently in demonstration fleets around the world), will be introduced later this year and will represent a leap forward toward a production ready version of a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle. For the longer term, GM sees hydrogen and fuel cells as the best combination of energy carrier and power source to achieve truly sustainable transportation. A fuel cell energized by hydrogen emits just pure water, produces no greenhouse gasses, and is twice as efficient as an internal combustion engine. Although hydrogen fuel cell technology was cast as a pie-in-the-sky technology by the moviemakers, GM is making great progress in fuel cell research and development and is on track to achieving its goal to validate and design a fuel cell propulsion system by 2010 that is competitive with current combustion systems on durability and performance, and that ultimately can be built at scale, affordably.
Add to all this GM's leadership in flex-fuel vehicles that run on clean-burning bio fuels such as corn-based ethanol and our new "active fuel management" system that shuts down half the engine's pistons at highway speeds to improve fuel economy, and we feel we are doing more than any other automaker to address the issues of oil dependence, fuel economy, and emissions from vehicles. And we are committed to do more.
Lastly, because the movie made some harsh criticisms of GM for discontinuing the EV1, let me set the record straight:
GM spent more than $1 billion developing the EV1 including significant sums on marketing and incentives to develop a mass market for it.
Only 800 vehicles were leased during a four-year period.
No other major automotive manufacturer is producing a pure electric vehicle for use on public roads and highways.
A waiting list of 5,000 only generated 50 people willing to follow through to a lease.
Because of low demand for the EV1, parts suppliers quit making replacement parts making future repair and safety of the vehicles difficult to nearly impossible.
Could GM have handled its decision to say "no" to offers to buy EV1s upon natural lease expirations better than it did? Sure. In some ways, I personally regret that we could not find a way for the EV1 lessees to keep their cars. We did what we felt was right in discontinuing a vehicle that we could no longer guarantee could be operated safely over the long term or that we would be able to repair.
In turn, GM engineers used EV1s for cold-weather testing to continue the technology transfer to hybrids and fuel cells. We also donated them to universities and museums. In fact, we donated an EV1 to the Smithsonian and are now being wrongly accused of a conspiracy with the museum because they removed the car for renovation of the National Museum of American History. I can assure you that this is nothing more than unfortunate timing.
So as right and as good as our intentions were, we understand that the moviemakers see them as wrong. We'll accept that criticism, but don't punish GM for doing a good deed. Rather, work with us and give us credit for taking a necessary first step in developing technologies that hold the potential to change the face of automobile transportation. That's what GM engineers are doing everyday.
Posted by Editor at June 23, 2006 10:41 AM
You beat me to it. I guess these people think this thing ran on love.
The consumer killed the electric car.
I'm still wondering Who Killed Roger Rabbit...
Poor rats...can't get anywhere without making something into a conspiracy.
WOW! That film crowd will stoop to anything to get their Commie point across! The old truism was, "So goes GM, so goes the nation".
I drove the EV-1 and it was a POS. Heavy, short range, handled like a dying elephant. If it had been a better car i could lament its passing, but it wasn't. Think of an electric Vega and you have the picture.
>The consumer killed the electric car.<
Oh, sorry, but I'm afraid the oil companies killed the electric car, and any possible substitute for oil anyone has come up with until now.
I love my current GM car. :-)
0-60 in ~4.3 seconds.
Nobody wanted a small, slow car that had a range of 50 miles. Who wants to run out of power in downtown Oakland???
Say you Fellas wouldn't have an outlet I can plug in for 8 hrs would you? No I don't want to give you $100, why?
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
Shalom Israel
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
LOL
Face it, electric cars are, for the most part, not very exciting. No thunderous bellow on acceleration, no tire-smoking performance off the line and through the curves, and not much for flashy accessories and add-ons. Up to now, electric cars have been APPLIANCES, not serious means of transportation.
But get enough energy density in a storage cell, or develop methanol-reformer fuel cells with enough capacity to put out some serious torque, and we might be going somewhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.