When Bush announced his policy on funding stem cell research in 2001, he may not have understood the science as well as Frist, but he had a superior grasp of the relevant moral principle: Researchers must never deliberately take innocent life. And the Culture of Death could care less about innocent life.
1 posted on
07/15/2006 1:01:36 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: Coleus
2 posted on
07/15/2006 1:02:03 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BIRDS; BlackElk; BlessedBeGod; ...
MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGDISCUSSION ABOUT:
President Bush vs. Dr. Frist vs. the Nuremburg Code
This explains exactly why Bush MUST veto embryonic stem cell research.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FReepMail wagglebee.
3 posted on
07/15/2006 1:04:02 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
There are no federal laws which prohibit stem cell research whatsoever. There are no federal laws which prohibit any private contributions by anyone for stem cell research. There are no federaL laws which would keep you are your neighbors from opening a lab for stem cell research. There are no federal laws that prohibit state governments from funding stem cell research.
So ... W-T-F is the problem? These morons think that ONLY federal money can research stem cells?
4 posted on
07/15/2006 1:24:50 PM PDT by
moonman
(`)
To: wagglebee
God bless President Bush for sticking to his guns on this one, and may He help him pull the trigger when the time comes.
6 posted on
07/15/2006 1:52:35 PM PDT by
Paperdoll
( on the cutting edge.)
To: wagglebee
The question is, who pressured Frist to change his tune?
7 posted on
07/15/2006 2:07:37 PM PDT by
Paperdoll
( on the cutting edge.)
To: wagglebee
Just a reason to remeber that despite some intolerable positions on immigration, and a reluctance to use the necessary measures in the Middle East and the Far East (you know who I mean), President Bush is infinitely preferable to any possible Democrat.
8 posted on
07/15/2006 4:37:33 PM PDT by
chesley
(Republicans don't deserve to win, but America does not deserve the Dhimmicrats.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson