Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
I distinctly said: "There are the 'support costs' behind that sheriff. He's probably costing $500 an hour just to have around "

That's all I've been discussing ~ the sheriff.

103 posted on 07/13/2006 3:06:57 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Let's look at what you said:

Post 65 "Very old fashioned, but there's no shop-lifting, no sheriff, and no ill-will."

This would obviously be a responding officer, not "the sheriff".

Post 71 "his vacation relief, his second and third shift relief,"

"The sheriff" doesn't have vacation relief, or second shift relief, or third shift relief.

Post 74 "For you to have an hour of the time of a sheriff, at your residence, while you report a crime"

Oh look there's you talking about a sheriff as a responding officer.

Post 77 "divide them by the number of hours actually worked by a sheriff, "

There's you once again talking about a sheriff doing responding officer work.

Post 79 "After all, if the sheriff wasn't arresting those people why would you need an attorney?"

There you have a sheriff that's arresting people, since top dog sheriffs almost never do actual arrests you must once again be talking about responding officers.

And then all of a sudden in post 85 you insist you're not talking about responding officers, only the guy in charge. You're a liar.


105 posted on 07/13/2006 3:14:41 PM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson