Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saab Receives Swedish Funding for Gripen Fighter Upgrades
Defense Industry Daily ^ | 10-Jul-2006

Posted on 07/11/2006 8:04:22 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Saab Receives FMV Funding for JAS-39 Gripen Upgrades

Posted 10-Jul-2006 10:17

Saab received a SEK 1 billion ($130 million equivalent) order from the Swedish Defence Material Administration (FMV), covering continued development of the JAS-39 Gripen fighter. The order reportedly covers various software upgrades, as well as other development activities supporting the long term development of the Gripen system. Work will be performed at Saab Aerosystems and Saab Aerotech in Linkoping, Sweden as well as at Saab Avitronics in Jarfalla and Kista, Sweden. See release.

The JAS-39 Gripen is a 4th generation lightweight fighter in service since 1993, and adopted by Sweden, The Czech Republic, Hungary and South Africa. Though they are highly capable aircraft, upgrades of some sort have been under discussion for some time....

The JAS-39DKs & JAS-39Ns on offer to Denmark and Norway would both be enhanced beyond the present C/D versions for greater range and payload. In addition, the recent agreement to develop the nEUROn unmanned UCAV fighter involved an agreement whereby the Swedish FMV procurement agency would offset Saab's nEUROn-related costs with a contribution to future development of the Saab JAS-39 Gripen manned lightweight fighter.

This would appear to be that contribution, and Flight International reports that Saab-led Gripen International is studying future development options.

Possibilities reportedly include:

Installation of a more powerful engine than the current GE F404 derivative from Volvo. GE's F414, in use on the F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet, would offer a 25% power upgrade if used as the new base engine, but this would also require a number of design modifications to the aircraft.

Increasing the Gripen's overall size and maximum take-off weight to increase range and payload. Some of the design modifications required for an F414 engine variant would require this anyway.

A thrust vectoring nozzle and conformal fuel tanks would allow the aircraft to take maximum advantage of the new power plant.

Integration of an AESA radar instead of Ericsson's PS05 (which was reportedly derived from the Sea Harrier's Blue Vixen) is also an important future selling point, with progressive updates possible from 2012-2018 that draw on Ericsson's "NORA" (Not Only RAdar) project. The least probable option, but perhaps the most interesting, involves the possible creation of a carrier-capable Gripen that would take advantage of the Gripen's natural short take-off and landing capabilities. Its most likely sales target would be India, with a possible role as a backup choice to Britain's F-35B Lightning II STOVLs on its new CVF carriers.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aesa; armsbuildup; czechrepublic; denmark; europeanunion; f414; fmv; ge; gripen; hungary; jas39; miltech; norway; saab; southafrica; sweden
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Enhanced Gripen concept

1 posted on 07/11/2006 8:04:28 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

ah geeze...not another Saab story...


2 posted on 07/11/2006 8:09:08 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

If you don't like this plane, you'd be gripe'n


3 posted on 07/11/2006 8:13:34 AM PDT by llevrok ("Drink your beer, damnit! There are people in Africa sober.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

As I look at this plane I wonder why our fighters do not have missiles that fire out the back as do Russians.
Anybody?
And what are these things stinging along behind?


4 posted on 07/11/2006 8:17:09 AM PDT by mcshot (Enemies pouring through our gates and others holding office under false pretenses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What are those things extending from the wingtips?


5 posted on 07/11/2006 8:20:54 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

Theyre Swedish medium range anti-aircraft missiles, at a guess.


6 posted on 07/11/2006 8:24:59 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mcshot; dljordan

I think those are towed airborne decoys to take care of enemy radar or SAMs.


7 posted on 07/11/2006 8:26:04 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

& how useful is a missile that fires rearward???


8 posted on 07/11/2006 8:27:28 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

The Russians do not typically carry missiles in chaser configuration anyway. The other thing is that our missiles *can* pull a 180 after launch and chase something behind the launching aircraft.


9 posted on 07/11/2006 8:27:34 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That's a cool little jet.


10 posted on 07/11/2006 8:37:39 AM PDT by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Spktyr answered my question.
Firing rearward would take out say a sukoi-30mki coming up on yer butt.
:-)
Thx
11 posted on 07/11/2006 10:58:10 AM PDT by mcshot (Enemies pouring through our gates and others holding office under false pretenses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

The Russians don't. It was trialled but never saw operational status.


12 posted on 07/11/2006 11:19:16 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

Actually the Sukhoi-30MKI is among the aircraft suppposed to be capable of rearward firing!!


13 posted on 07/11/2006 11:30:19 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

"You must think in Russian. You cannot think in English and transpose."


14 posted on 07/11/2006 11:33:54 AM PDT by Reagan Disciple (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo

Something about them causing a lot of drag and slowing the aircraft down tended to make them a bit unpopular among pilots. The other issue, that I've heard persistent rumors about, would make them extremely unpopular; supposedly they tended to get blinded by the launcher aircraft's exhaust - assuming they didn't just lock on it and chase/kill the launcher plane.


15 posted on 07/11/2006 1:41:06 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson