Posted on 07/10/2006 8:53:40 PM PDT by LdSentinal
My eyes.....my eyes..............................
July 10, 2006
decapped dupes
thomastucker.jpg
Continue reading "decapped dupes"
Posted by Deb at 10:35 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
recruiting troops
This real life video game is too dastardly, exciting with twists and turns. I don't want to blog about he who shall not be named, but I'd love to form a discussion group among like-minded warriors or even just warriors fascinated by the workings of the mind of the count.
Submit application by sending me an email asking to join.
Moonbats need apply.
Anklebiters need not.
Posted by Deb at 09:49 PM | TrackBack (0)
walking in memphis
I received this email:
"I am sorry to read about your troubles. I believe you that you were never a threat to Mr. Goldstein's son, that it was just an internet altercation that got out of hand.
I am concerned for you and I will be praying for you that you get through this. Please don't be offended because I don't mean to offend you, I know that you are an anti-Christian atheist. (I'm catholic btw) Normally I'd just pray for you and not offend you by telling you. But I think you will be in for quite a storm (which I hope blows over quickly) so I wanted to send you the following prayer. It's ok to pray it even though you don't believe."
He then attached Psalm 25.
I wrote back and said these days, I don't mind people praying for me - I'll take all the help I can get.
I felt like Marc Cohn:
"Tell me are you a Christian child?
And I said "Ma'am I am tonight."
Posted by Deb at 08:26 PM | TrackBack (0)
collateral damage
Garrett O'Hara, a University of Arizona student writes:
You owe a sincere apology not only to Mr. Goldstein but to your university community for dragging all of us down with you.
Garrett,
I really am sorry for saying that I would be indifferent to the suffering of Mr. Goldstein's child. And I am sorry that the UA's name was dragged into this. And I regret how this has upset and stressed out my family and friends.
I really do apologize for embarrassing the students and faculty at the University of Arizona.
This will be my last post on South(west)paw on the Goldstein affair for at least one month.
Thanks for your message,
DF
Posted by Deb at 02:01 PM | TrackBack (0)
http://debfrisch.com/
She's only "sorry", because she got more than she ever bargained for. After all, aren't us righties just wimps?
...didn't learn a damn thing.
$80,000 of tuition, fees and room and board flushed down the toilet.
I agree. She admits to them. Why does Alfred Kaszniak, head of the psychology department, use the word "alleged"?
"Can you feeel the love tonight..."
I agree. I read her comments. As low as one can go.
I wondered if I was the only one who noticed the spin and the down-playing of what this waste of breath said,and how the article tried to twist it to make her into the "victim". She got fired,or had to resign? So what-she had that coming simply because someone with her mentality has no business being in an influential position over young minds.
She has a whole lot more coming to her for the remarks she made,and I hope she reaps the full fruits of the "fame" this sick scumbag so desperately sought. I wish that I could remember on which website I read today,that this isn't the first time that she's mentioned children in her spittle-spewing rants. No one in their right mind should let a child within 20 miles of her.
Ballistic is the word
In my experience the Psychology majors have the largest segment of disfunctional raving lunatics. They are trying to understand themselves, I think.
Is she mad at "white men" because they don't want her and she ran to a woman for comfort? What is the deal with this intense hatred? Yikes.
Most of the responses on her website, as could be expected, were highly critical. A number of them suggested that what she did has now become part of Internet 'history' which will never go away. They also alluded to prospective employers using Google to do background research on prospective employees.
I think there's some truth to this, and she will find it rather difficult to find appropriate employment. I don't know where the comment came from about her 'partner' wanting to find work that provides benefits for her(Fritsh), but maybe they've come to realize exactly what she's done. Who knows, maybe her partner has more lucidity that this piece of work.
The department head Alfred's little poor, poor pitiful us quotes wore on my nerves almost as much as the behavior of his psycho faculty member.
How much would you like to bet that this resignation act she's putting on is all smoke screen. I wouldn't doubt at all that this sick freak's resignation is bogus or it won't be 'accepted.'
Let's hope she's not foisted once again on hapless and impressionable students by the University of Arizona. But I wouldn't bet against that either. If they can't get away with that, they'll likely find an invisible 'research' job for her where the public can't see her.
Refer to post #97, this thread. It links to a short series of these two women, Deborah Frisch and Cecile McKee shown with a dog. Judging by the appearance of the two women, these pictures were taken at an earlier date than the one you commented on.
The absence of a child in these earlier photos is interesting. If the photo with child is more recent, then one of the two would have had to have birthed that child subsequent to the earlier photos (if the child was in existence at the time of the earlier photos why wasn't she included?). The fact that they were 'partners' in both sets of photos means that one of the two admitted lesbians would have had to have birthed a child during their relationship; something not very likely IMHO.
Obviously, someone was also in the kitchen taking the photo. We don't know the provenance of the photo, but it's possible to assume that the child belongs to someone else who happened to be in the house when the kitchen photo was taken. Of course, all this is speculation, but makes as much sense as that 'young' child belonging to one of these women.
Just my two cents worth.
She keeps referring to inappropriate comments made about her...does anyone have those? I'm just curious to see what someone said to obviously make her so angry that she couldn't control what she was saying. Libs are so funny...they are so 'nice' when they are getting their way, but disagree and possibly defuse their argument, and their heads explode.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.