I wondered if I was the only one who noticed the spin and the down-playing of what this waste of breath said,and how the article tried to twist it to make her into the "victim". She got fired,or had to resign? So what-she had that coming simply because someone with her mentality has no business being in an influential position over young minds.
She has a whole lot more coming to her for the remarks she made,and I hope she reaps the full fruits of the "fame" this sick scumbag so desperately sought. I wish that I could remember on which website I read today,that this isn't the first time that she's mentioned children in her spittle-spewing rants. No one in their right mind should let a child within 20 miles of her.
Most of the responses on her website, as could be expected, were highly critical. A number of them suggested that what she did has now become part of Internet 'history' which will never go away. They also alluded to prospective employers using Google to do background research on prospective employees.
I think there's some truth to this, and she will find it rather difficult to find appropriate employment. I don't know where the comment came from about her 'partner' wanting to find work that provides benefits for her(Fritsh), but maybe they've come to realize exactly what she's done. Who knows, maybe her partner has more lucidity that this piece of work.
The department head Alfred's little poor, poor pitiful us quotes wore on my nerves almost as much as the behavior of his psycho faculty member.
How much would you like to bet that this resignation act she's putting on is all smoke screen. I wouldn't doubt at all that this sick freak's resignation is bogus or it won't be 'accepted.'
Let's hope she's not foisted once again on hapless and impressionable students by the University of Arizona. But I wouldn't bet against that either. If they can't get away with that, they'll likely find an invisible 'research' job for her where the public can't see her.