Interesting, albeit slightly dishonest, debating technique.
I repeat. Referring to current standards of US warfare (as I'm sure everyone else in the discussion was), there is NO parallel between accidental collateral damage in war when every effort is made to prevent it, and the deliberate snuffing out of innocent life by (unnecessary) 'research.'
You still lost the argument..........even with your shady debating style.
No, it's not. We were talking about killing innocents to save lives, and I mentioned war...no times, no particular sides, just war. If every effort were really made to prevent collateral damage, then the damage would not be inflicted and it wouldn't happen at all...it's factored in.
If you truly do not believe that innocent civilians are knowingly killed during war, then I envy your naivete.
I'm not debating, and there is no winning or losing. If that's what it is to you, fine.