No, it's not. We were talking about killing innocents to save lives, and I mentioned war...no times, no particular sides, just war. If every effort were really made to prevent collateral damage, then the damage would not be inflicted and it wouldn't happen at all...it's factored in.
If you truly do not believe that innocent civilians are knowingly killed during war, then I envy your naivete.
I'm not debating, and there is no winning or losing. If that's what it is to you, fine.
Trying to prove that the American military kills innocent civilians deliberately, so that the killing of innocent babies is somehow justified?
Stop being cryptic and cute, and make your point.
"If every effort were really made to prevent collateral damage, then the damage would not be inflicted and it wouldn't happen at all."
How naive. We can not prevent our soldiers, sailors, etc from being killed in accidents in and out of war, but you think we can prevent all collateral damage, and if there is any collateral damage we just don't want to prevent it bad enough.