Skip to comments.
Judge rules FBI search of Rep. William Jefferson's Capitol Hill office was constitutional
CNN ^
| 7/10/2006
| CNN
Posted on 07/10/2006 1:38:58 PM PDT by eraser2005
BREAKING NEWS:Judge rules FBI search of Rep. William Jefferson's Capitol Hill office was constitutional
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: 109th; dubai; fbi; netlink; norefugescoundrels; ruling; shareasale; verichip; williamjefferson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: epluribus_2
Now if only we had some sitting judges willing to issue search warrants. Hmmm.
To: eraser2005
My thoughts? No sh**, Sherlock... :)LOL. I'll second that :)
22
posted on
07/10/2006 2:32:55 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: eraser2005
Both interesting and sad how many of the people we've sent to Washington thought it important and right to interfere with this legal investigation. Food for thought...
To: epluribus_2
Let's be clear about something, he's a crook who got caught and just like any other crook he has to pay the price.
24
posted on
07/10/2006 4:46:28 PM PDT
by
chiefqc
To: chiefqc
Congress will regret allowing this to go to the courts. As long as it hadn't been ruled on, they were on stronger ground on refusing the DOJ access to their offices....because there was some doubt as to the legality of entering. Well, now we KNOW that the DOJ can go in and snuffle through the freezer any time they feel like they have probable cause. Frozen pizza with a side of cash, anyone?
25
posted on
07/10/2006 4:58:42 PM PDT
by
lOKKI
(You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass)
To: DB
and hastert has been silent on this ruling today; I bet he heard from a lot of us about his outrageous position on this in the early days. Good decision by the Judge.
26
posted on
07/10/2006 5:01:53 PM PDT
by
Laverne
To: tflabo
Don't you see or hear the difference: This news on ABC, CNN and others conveniently neglecting to inform about Rep. Jefferson's political party, the 'D' word.
When Delay was smeared, he was the 'REPUBLICAN majority leader' 24/7. Listening and watching today , it's 'Congressman Jefferson' no 'Democrat', not even 'from Louisiana'.
Next we'll hear from the MSM how this ruling smacks of latent racism and that this judge was appointed by Coolidge, a known conservative right winger.
To: eraser2005
Put the corrupt SOB behind bars. Now!
28
posted on
07/10/2006 5:03:39 PM PDT
by
blam
To: WLR
nonsense. the constitution does protect congrespersons with regards to their duties within the context of their role as legislators. that role does not include bribery and general crimes, and that's what this case is about.
To: Red Badger
Yeah, there was a lot of doubt. In fact, the judge is wrong as he will shortly discover when he finds out GSA has no funds to heat his office this winter.
Congress long ago put their various office buildings, as well as the Capitol, OFFLIMITS TO THE COPS ~ that's why there are Capitol Police.
30
posted on
07/10/2006 5:31:13 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Congressman Billybob
Billybob, as Billybob 9 might even note, the Senator Brewster case was fundamentally different from this particular case.
Whether or not the other Congress-critter takes bribes really doesn't have beans to do with the prerogative of the King's men to ransack the Congressional compound, and you know that.
Otherwise, you'd had Billzo's boys in there searching your offices for all those guns you keep stuffed into drawers and safes and slapping you down with the DC anti-gun law.
31
posted on
07/10/2006 5:33:57 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Laverne
Hastert's initial position was Constitutionally and historically correct. Freeper opposition to that position was based on a lack of historic perspective.
That's putting it charitably.
32
posted on
07/10/2006 5:36:04 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: eraser2005
Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., makes a statement at Washington's National Airport on his way to Switzerland. (AP Photo)

" This is total racism. I am innocent. "
" Look, I had 90 large ones in my freezer because, as a compassionate and tolerant Democrat, I was helping out a distinguished foreign dignitary."
"What happened was I got an email from Nigerian General Kachinga Cheatchusuckah, who had a problem."
" When Gen Cheatchusuckah transfers Idi Amin's secret Ugandan gold reserves
from a Swiss bank vault to a refrigerated truck I leased, it will all make sense."
33
posted on
07/10/2006 5:37:51 PM PDT
by
Liz
(The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
To: blam
The idea that congressmen would threaten to with hold funding for the FBI or DOJ over this is what gets me!
34
posted on
07/10/2006 5:39:30 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: tet68
"The idea that congressmen would threaten to with hold funding for the FBI or DOJ over this is what gets me!" Yup, me too. I immediately thought of Mugabe.
35
posted on
07/10/2006 5:41:54 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Liz
"...on his way to Switzerland." Going to make a deposit or a withdrawal?
36
posted on
07/10/2006 5:45:52 PM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Stop the Nifongery!)
To: eraser2005
Greeeeeaaaaattttt!!!! I will still get to listen to my a-hole Congressman, Sensenbrenner try to argue this is un-Constitutional.
To: eraser2005
Judge rules FBI search of Rep. William Jefferson's Capitol Hill office was constitutional The only ones who thought otherwise were US Congressmen who thought that they were about the law.
38
posted on
07/10/2006 5:53:21 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: WLR
"They have the power to outlaw such an action and I hope they do. " But you can see that it would be politically risky to do so. The mob loves this ruling.
Hopefully the Constitution will be upheld on appeal.
39
posted on
07/10/2006 5:59:59 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: TommyDale
He's going to meet Gen Kachinga Cheatchusuckah to checkout Idi Amin's secret Swiss gold stash.
40
posted on
07/10/2006 6:08:49 PM PDT
by
Liz
(The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson