Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: FBI raid on lawmaker's office legal (Louisiana Democrat Rep. William Jefferson )
AP on Yahoo ^ | 7/10/06 | Toni Locy - ap

Posted on 07/10/2006 1:36:15 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - An FBI raid on a Louisiana congressman's Capitol Hill office was legal, a federal judge ruled Monday.

Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said members of Congress are not above the law. He rejected requests from lawmakers and Democratic Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record) to return material seized by the FBI in a May 20-21 search of Jefferson's office.

In a 28-page opinion, Hogan dismissed arguments that the first-ever raid on a congressman's office violated the Constitution's protections against intimidation of elected officials.

"Congress' capacity to function effectively is not threatened by permitting congressional offices to be searched pursuant to validly issued search warrants," said Hogan, who had approved the FBI's request to conduct the overnight search of Jefferson's office.

Jefferson had sought the return of several computer hard drives, floppy disks and two boxes of paper documents that FBI agents seized during an 18-hour search of his Rayburn Building office.

At issue was a constitutional provision known as the speech and debate clause, which protects elected officials from being questioned by the president, a prosecutor or a plaintiff in a lawsuit about their legislative work.

"No one argues that the warrant executed upon Congressman Jefferson's office was not properly administered," Hogan wrote. "Therefore, there was no impermissible intrusion on the Legislature. The fact that some privileged material was incidentally captured by the search does not constitute an unlawful intrusion."

The raid on Jefferson's office angered members of Congress, some of whom threatened to retaliate by tinkering with the FBI and Justice Department budgets.

President Bush stepped in and ordered the solicitor general to take custody of the seized materials so Congress and the Justice Department could work out procedures to deal with similar situations in the future.

The president's 45-day "cooling off period" ended Sunday with no compromise worked out but with assurances from the Justice Department that it would not seek to regain custody of the materials until Hogan ruled on Jefferson's request.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: congress; corruption; fbi; govwatch; judge; judiciary; lawmaker; legal; office; raid; williamjefferson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: NormsRevenge

This is GREAT news!


61 posted on 07/10/2006 4:50:17 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppelin
Said freepers will NEVER apologize to the President.

That would require character and thoughtfulness, and not knee jerk bashing.

It'll never happen.

62 posted on 07/10/2006 4:53:22 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
And they'll never apologize to him.

Reasons stated above.

63 posted on 07/10/2006 4:55:01 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Maybe the FBI should just clean out the refrigerators...

Oh heck, the entire office complex of every member of congress.....

the buggers need to spend time in jail...

... ALL OF THEM!

64 posted on 07/10/2006 4:55:26 PM PDT by pointsal (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Terrible.

Since the feds have now seen the evidence, when he is over-ruled the only recourse may be to let Jefferson off scot free.

It's possible he's senile:
"Amicus contends that even a review of the documents by the Court to determine privilege is unconstitutional. See Amicus Brief 29."

No, they didn't.:

"... Member to be present at the search and to be permitted to remove Speech or Debate pricileged materials prior to the search (subject , of course, to later judicial review as now occurs in the sdubpoena context)."

65 posted on 07/10/2006 5:50:02 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The raid on Jefferson's office angered members of Congress, some of whom threatened to retaliate by tinkering with the FBI and Justice Department budgets.

Notice that while they use the "intimidation" clause as a shield for illegal activities, the first thing they come back with is ... budgetary intimidation.

66 posted on 07/10/2006 5:52:28 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Go home and fix Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Good question! LOL.


67 posted on 07/10/2006 6:04:30 PM PDT by NewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said members of Congress are not above the law."

Chief Judge Hogan is an excellent judge. I had the honor of providing expert testimony before judge Hogan. He is sharp as a tack, and treated witnesses with respect.

68 posted on 07/10/2006 6:32:29 PM PDT by Go Gordon (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This will coincide very neatly with the start of all the Dimcratz election campaigns; it was so convenient of the Dims to seek the 45 day delay. If they hadn't gotten the 45 day delay, this might have all blown over by now, instead it will play out while they're trying to make their msgs resonate with the public. God bless them.


69 posted on 07/10/2006 6:59:14 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said members of Congress are not above the law."

finally some common sense from the bench!


70 posted on 07/10/2006 7:04:57 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Hooray Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan!

ORIGINAL INTENT BUMP~!


71 posted on 07/10/2006 7:11:38 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
[Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said members of Congress are not above the law. ]

Wow. Somebody had better inform the Congress about this development.

72 posted on 07/10/2006 8:54:43 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Liberalism's main product is Destruction and Death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

the only "chilling effect" and "cooling off period" should pertain to the $90k in cash in the Democrat crook's frig.


73 posted on 07/10/2006 8:58:17 PM PDT by RacerX1128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
[Losing his seat on the influential Ways and Means Committee and being investigated in a federal bribery probe could actually benefit U.S. Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.) in his bid for reelection, said Ken Moore, professor of political science at the University of Louisiana. "Being seen as a taker of bribes will probably help him with the typical Louisiana Democratic voter. Yielding to temptation makes him more human. Working the system to extract extra benefits makes him crafty. These are traits admired by the chiselers and parasites that comprise the voting base in this state." ]

The OJ syndrome.

You couldn't make this stuff up.

74 posted on 07/10/2006 9:01:24 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Liberalism's main product is Destruction and Death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Good for Judge Hogan, at least there's one judge who gets it.

NEWS FLASH:::: Judge Hogan has announced his plans to retire (resign) from his position.

Judge Hogan has decided to resign from the bench early today due to making a good common sense decision. Democrats applaud this move by Hogan saying, "We just can't have judges doing the right thing. Hogan was instructed by California's Barbara Boxer to reject allowing the FBI raid on William Jefferson, Democrat, Louisiana."

Boxer was quoted "he should have just listened to us. We gave him the best advice we could lie, I mean think of."


75 posted on 07/10/2006 9:17:25 PM PDT by antiunion person (Stop the leaking of information to save lives and win the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: antiunion person

There is bitter truth in this.

Nothing makes the world more chaotic, irrational, insane, than the authority of Liberals.


76 posted on 07/10/2006 9:36:53 PM PDT by Stallone (Mainstream Media is dead. I helped kill it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: All

U.S. Representative William Jefferson (D-LA) is seen in this June 1, 2006 file photo. A federal judge on Monday upheld the FBI's unprecedented search of the office of Jefferson, a Louisiana Democrat who is the target of a bribery investigation. (Lee Celano/Reuters)


77 posted on 07/10/2006 10:34:14 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi --- Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A Reagan appointee.
:-)


78 posted on 07/10/2006 10:37:52 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Pelosi Statement on Judge's Decision on FBI Raid of Congressional Office

To: National Desk

Contact: Brendan Daly or Jennifer Crider, 202-226-7616, both of the Office of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi

WASHINGTON, July 10 /U.S. Newswire/ -- House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today on Judge Thomas F. Hogan's ruling upholding his approval of the search warrant of Representative William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record)'s congressional office:

"No one is above the law and no Members of the House can use a congressional office to conceal evidence of criminal wrongdoing or to shield them from prosecution.

"This particular search could have been conducted in a manner that fully protected the ability of the prosecutors to obtain the evidence needed to do their job while preserving constitutional principles.

"The House will continue discussions with the Department of Justice to develop procedures so that any future searches of Members' offices will protect the ability of the FBI to do its job and maintain the constitutional balance between the Legislative and Executive branches of government."

http://www.usnewswire.com/

79 posted on 07/10/2006 10:42:48 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi --- Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

The constitution always said so, but congresscritters hold judges in higher regard.


80 posted on 07/11/2006 12:49:11 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson