Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lepton

No because part of what copyright is about is protecting the content as well, copyright holders get to decide what modification are made prior to distribution, if they are no longer allowed to do that then they've lost half of why copyright exists, and with that half gone it won't be long before they start losing the money (hey why should you pay somebody for a product that you modified before distributing, it's just as much your product as theirs at that point).


225 posted on 07/10/2006 9:57:38 AM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

"No because part of what copyright is about is protecting the content as well, copyright holders get to decide what modification are made prior to distribution, if they are no longer allowed to do that then they've lost half of why copyright exists, and with that half gone it won't be long before they start losing the money (hey why should you pay somebody for a product that you modified before distributing, it's just as much your product as theirs at that point)."

Your argument falls flat on its face. As long as the creator is paid in full, there is no problem. As long as GM gets paid for its car, I can modify it any way I want.


230 posted on 07/10/2006 10:03:36 AM PDT by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson