To: Hendrix
I would be. Copyright holders should make the determination of what versions of their material are out there. I also would want to have to filter through a dozen different edits of a movie to make sure I was getting the one I want, it's annoying enough with the special expanded editions muddying the waters.
150 posted on
07/10/2006 9:20:29 AM PDT by
discostu
(you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
To: discostu
"I would be. Copyright holders should make the determination of what versions of their material are out there. I also would want to have to filter through a dozen different edits of a movie to make sure I was getting the one I want, it's annoying enough with the special expanded editions muddying the waters."
You would be in the small minority with your view. Most of the public will go for this. You would not have to filter though anything. If you want the original, it will be there. If you want a sanitized version, then you would have a choice of which version you wanted.
155 posted on
07/10/2006 9:22:56 AM PDT by
Hendrix
To: discostu
I would be. Copyright holders should make the determination of what versions of their material are out there. I also would want to have to filter through a dozen different edits of a movie to make sure I was getting the one I want, it's annoying enough with the special expanded editions muddying the waters. So you would be OK with these companies' original business model where a customer purchases a movie, mails it in, asks for specific cuts, and gets it back cut the way he/she wants?
244 posted on
07/10/2006 10:09:56 AM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson