Bush's Disconnect on Illegal Immigration

WND.com ^ | 07-10-06 | Farah, Joseph

[Theodore R.]

Bush's disconnect on illegal immigration

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: July 10, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

"We cannot kick people out who have been here for awhile."

That's what President Bush said last week.

And he means it.

That is his policy toward those who have broken into our country, defied our immigration laws, cheapened our way of life and driven a stake through the heart of what it means to be an American.

This is amnesty, no matter what the president says.

If we "can't kick people out who have been here for awhile," then we have no alternative but to forgive and forget they broke the law.

What other possibility is there? How else can one define amnesty?

By making this ludicrous, untrue declaration, Bush has once again waved the white flag of surrender to the hordes who continue to invade our country. He has thrown out the welcome mat for more illegal entry.

Though no statistics are yet available, you can be sure this sign of weakness in leadership was a great encouragement to those still seeking to break into America. Every time this guy opens his mouth on this issue, more illegals make their way across the Rio Grande seeing what could be their last chance to get in, what could be the last wave of an open-door policy by the U.S.

Bush is a lame duck, and he doesn't care. He doesn't care what continued illegal immigration will do to his country. He doesn't care what it will do to his legacy. He doesn't care what it will do to his party in November and in 2008.

He's serving some other master. He's got some other agenda. He's carrying out his father's promise to usher America into a New World Order.

Can I ask some simple questions? What does it mean that we can't kick out people who have been here for awhile? Why is that? What does "for awhile" mean?

Where does Bush get off making such a statement? He was elected and sworn into office to enforce the law of the land. The law of the land is clear on what happens to lawbreakers. They are punished. Those who break immigration laws are deported. There are no special provisions in the law for those who have been here "for awhile," whatever that means.

How does he get away with this kind of trash talk?

I understand he is speaking his mind. I understand he is advocating a viewpoint. But when the president's viewpoint runs contrary to the law of the land, there is no question that he is obligated to enforce the laws, not ignore them, not subvert them, not undermine them.

If Bush wants to change the laws, he is welcome to try. But while he remains president, he is sworn to execute the current laws – whether he likes them or not.

So far, Bush has found little support among the people for his promotion of amnesty. Yet he continues to promote it. Again, whatever his objectives, he is welcome to try. But he defies the Constitution, the Congress, his oath of office, the rule of law and the will of the people when he refuses to enforce the law.

Bush is recklessly irresponsible on immigration. He's like a spoiled child who refuses to do the right thing simply because he has staked out a position against it.

He has no credibility on his primary mission as president – protecting the American people and defending the homeland – as he continues to promote the idea that anyone and everyone is welcome in the U.S.

Bush's behavior can no longer be confused with political tone deafness. He's got an agenda he is promoting. It is not a traditional American agenda. It is an internationalist agenda. It is a multinational corporate agenda. It is an elitist agenda.

It has never been more obvious than it is today.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Peach]

At the start of his campaign for president in 1979, then Candidate Reagan proposed a new law that would create a totally open boarder with both MEXICO and CANADA. He called it the North American Accord plan. Reagan proposed that citizens of all three nations could cross the borders at will for any normal purpose including business purposes and taking jobs.

Under the 1979 Reagan plan any Mexican citizen could cross the United States border with only a birth certificate. They could work and stay in the USA for as long as they wished. Under the Reagan accord the Mexican border was to be free and open. There could be no illegal Mexican immigration. The fact that the person wanting to immigrate was Mexican made the immigration legal.

Of course Reagan never got what he wanted in that regard. The 1986 bill that Reagan signed and approved gave illegal Mexican immigrants amnesty. Amnesty was as close as Reagan go his immigration desires. The north american free trade agreement was just a portion of the propsed North American Accord.

Reagan made the case many times that a totally open border with Mexico would bring prosperity to both nations.

Compared to Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush is hard liner on immigration.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Ronald_Reagan_Immigration.htm

[mo]

Great...by this logic, those that haven'nt paid taxes for a while...well NO NEED TO!!

[DoctorMichael]

Presidente Jorge Boosh Bump!

[zeugma]

great stats spiff! Thanks!

[deport]

Don't confuse them now. President Reagan went on to continue his belief that borders should be open... note the following:

Some may call is mysticism if they will, but I cannot help but feel that there was some divine plan that placed this continent here between the two great oceans to be found by people from any corner of the earth -- people who had an extra ounce of desire for freedom and some extra courage to rise up and lead their families, their relatives, their friends, their nations and come here to eventually make this country.

The truth of the matter is, if we take this crowd and if we could go through and ask the heritage, the background of every family represented here, we would probably come up with the names of every country on earth, every corner of the world, and every race. Here, is the one spot on earth where we have the brotherhood of man. And maybe as we continue with this proudly, this brotherhood of man made up from people representative of every corner of the earth, maybe one day boundaries all over the earth will disappear as people cross boundaries and find out that, yes, there is a brotherhood of man in every corner.

Thank you all and God Bless you all.

[bold my emphasis]

[jocko12]

But we can deport them all to Crawford,Texas.

[american spirit]

Same goes for these neutered folks in Congress who don'thave the stones to stand up to any Pres. that issues unconstitutional executive orders or 'agreements' like the SPP.

[LachlanMinnesota]

An having seen nthat Clinton's new laws were having an impact on immigration, President Bush raced to change those laws, and made certain that he did not use all of the funds allocated by Congress for increased Border Patrol.

While your facts are interesting, and possibly even true, the point is that neither party is doing anything about this, and Clinton's signing of these laws was a part of a long term plan, which happened to give cover to the President because he can point to CLinton as the falt. However, he has done nothing to correct these problems.

[kabar]

Bush is one reason the No Mexican Left Behind bill was not laughed out of the Senate. Instead it passed.

It passed because 39 out of 44 Dems voted FOR it, while Senate Reps voted 32-23 AGAINST it.

[Millee]

Bump for later

[Spiff]

An having seen nthat Clinton's new laws were having an impact on immigration, President Bush raced to change those laws, and made certain that he did not use all of the funds allocated by Congress for increased Border Patrol. While your facts are interesting, and possibly even true, the point is that neither party is doing anything about this, and Clinton's signing of these laws was a part of a long term plan, which happened to give cover to the President because he can point to CLinton as the falt. However, he has done nothing to correct these problems.

Meanwhile, President Bush, in chorus with Ted Kennedy and La Raza, started promising amnesty, rewards, benefits, jobs, privileges, and even citizenship to anyone who could swim, walk, run, hike, sneak, or otherwise illegally cross the border. He not only failed to properly enforce the laws he is supposed to enforce, but he made the problem worse.

[Reagan Man]

A non sequitur post by you.

This isn't about Reagan. Reagan is dead. This is about Bush`s desire to see liberal immigration policy become the law of the land. Bush favors a liberal guest worker program and a path to citizenship for illegals. Bush favors AMNESTY! Period. In 1986 there were 2.6 million illegals in the mix. Today, there are some 15-30 million illegals looking for amnesty.

Statements made by Ronald Reagan almost 25-30 years ago aren't relevent to the current problems we have with illegal immigration today. Truth is, Reagan demanded that strong employer sanctions be included in the IRCA of 1986. Only then did Reagan sign it into law. The up to one million dollar employer fines for hiring illegals is still the law of the land. If Ted Kennedy hadn't underfunded those employer sanctions, we wouldn't have had 20 years of liberal immigration policy under Bush41, Clinton and Bush43.

IN addition, Reagan wasn't into making the same mistake twice. If Reagan was around today, he would oppose Bush`s liberal immigration policy. And don't say that Reagan wouldn't have changed his mind on the immigration issue. After all, Reagan became a strong pro-lifer after he saw the effects of the first few years of Roe vs Wade, not to mention some serious "soul searching" on the right to life issue.

[democrats_nightmare]

Your spinning about Reagan and 25 year old issues does not water down the treasonous behavior of Bush, RINOS and the Democrats to sell us down the river on illegal immigration. Now we are dealing with 15-20 million not the 1-2 million of that era.

But its interesting how now even "Bubba" Bill Clinton is praising the president on his illegal immigration scheme. So to me that puts Clinton, Bushbots like "peach" (and the other liberal republicans in this conservative forum) and El-Presidente Jorge Bushe' as thinking alike.

But then again great minds think alike / sarcasm off and birds of a feather flock together.

[Spiff]

I won't be the first, but I'll say it anyway.

Ronald Reagan, like President Bush, was right on many thing and wrong on others. Ronald Reagan was flat out wrong about amnesty, softened borders, and union with Mexico and Canada. President Bush is right about the war on terror, among other things, but flat out wrong about amnesty, open borders, and union with Mexico and Canada.

The 1986 amnesty was a disaster and it lead to the terrible immigration problem we have today in that we have something like 20 million invaders in our country that our leaders say that we can't do anything about except to reward them and call them Americans. We need to learn from our mistakes. We don't want to repeat that same mistake or worsen it.

[kittymyrib]

W has an emotional attachment to the illegal nanny/housekeeper who helped raise him. It's totally understandable. For the rest of us, who didn't employ an illegal to help raise our children, we are not emotionally invested in excusing law breakers who have no business being in this country. Instead of us caving to his viewpoint, I wish he would get busy and uphold the law, as he swore to do.

[deport]

Maybe President Reagan and others are wrong but then maybe they see a much larger picture of the world, its people and relationships between countries as the world in effect becomes smaller because of communication/transportation/shared knowledge, etc.

From President Reagan's State of the Union speech, 1988:

This year, we have it within our power to take a major step toward a growing global economy and an expanding cycle of prosperity that reaches to all the free nations of this Earth. I'm speaking of the historic Free Trade Agreement negotiated between our country and Canada. And I can also tell you that we're determined to expand this concept, south as well as north. Next month I will be traveling to Mexico where trade matters will be of foremost concern. And, over the next several months, our Congress and the Canadian Parliament can make the start of such a North American accord a reality. Our goal must be a day when the free flow of trade -- from the tip of Tierra del Fuego to the Arctic Circle -- unites the people of the Western Hemisphere in a bond of mutually beneficial exchange; when all borders become what the U.S.-Canadian border so long has been -- a meeting place, rather than a dividing line. (Applause.)

God bless President Reagan and America.....

[Kimberly GG]

Speaking of 'disconnect' (or hypocracy).....From Bush's recent speech in Chicago:

7/7/06
"People in this country expect us to secure the border, and we will...............BUT...... in order to enforce this border, we've got to have a rational way that recognizes there are people sneaking across to do work Americans aren't doing. They're doing jobs Americans are not filling."
GWB on border security/illegal immigration

7/7/06
"And part of our objective is to make sure that NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS, security of the world interests, TRUMP ECONOMIC INTERESTS. And sometimes that takes a while to get people focused in the right direction."
GWB on North Korea Crises


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/07/20060707-1.html

[Peach]

LOL.

No, we wouldn't want to confuse them. Half of them aren't conservatives at all but disruptors sent here to sow dissent among Republicans on the forum. The others are just garden variety jerks. LOL

[VOA]

bump

[sine_nomine]

Not one Republican should have voted for it.

Bush continues to work to keep all the illegals.

Tony Snow said it's like a traffic ticket. Boy, it's good we got a conservative spin-doctor at the White House.

The Democrats should not have voted for the bill either.