Well, I am sure Chinese take notice.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...
To: TigerLikesRooster
Yep, a lot of countries in the region wouldn't like it.
3 posted on
07/10/2006 12:24:08 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
While considering the acceptability, one needs to consider feasibility as well. The targets are protected. The easiest way to take them out [short of massive manned effort which would need a lot of equipment and be very risky] would be rocketry nuking.
4 posted on
07/10/2006 12:24:30 AM PDT by
GSlob
To: TigerLikesRooster; Dog; section9

Taiwan just test-launched its new medium-range missile. India just test-launched its new long-range missile. The U.S. just parked a few of its many anti-missile AEGIS ships on both sides of North Korea, and now Japan is rattling its saber about attacking North Korea.
Perfection. This is how global diplomacy is pursued by adults. No kow-towing. No appeasement.
Talks on the one hand, military force on the other.
How refreshing to see global coordination against North Korea (e.g. 13 nations boarding NK's ships) rather than Madeline Halfbright-style concessions.
Life is good!
7 posted on
07/10/2006 12:44:20 AM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: TigerLikesRooster
9 posted on
07/10/2006 12:47:14 AM PDT by
nopardons
To: TigerLikesRooster
Japan could send a clear message by repealing Article 9 of their Constitution. It is now outdated - Japan has fully modernized and is no longer vulnerable to becoming a dictatorial, military regime again, bent on building an empire.
To: TigerLikesRooster
As they probably don't want to see a re-militarized Japan, I imagine that they would indeed take notice.
22 posted on
07/10/2006 2:37:03 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
We should "interpose no objection" to a Japanese doctrine of strategic preemption. Especially since the ROK has become la la land regarding their evil cousins in the north.
A re militarized Japan just might help cause China and Russia to curb their enthusiasm for arming Pyongyang and snickering at us while their jackass eater throws sand at all the other kids in the sandbox.
23 posted on
07/10/2006 2:54:24 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Japanese islands total less than the size of California, but with half the population of the United states.
They are the second largest economy, and it would be foolish to sit back while North Korea continues 'testing' long range missiles. Blackmail or aggression on Japan by North Korea, whatever the ploy, the land of the rising sun will have to protect its citizens. The hostilities from North Korea along with the aggression overtly displayed by China in its quest for resources, threaten Japan.
The Japanese realize they can depend on the United States BUT it is also time to step into the batters box. They can easily afford to arm and defend themselves and slow these rogue and despot Nations, that belligerence towards the United States is simply not enough to intimidate Japan, among others.
Less than 24 hours after the N Korean 'tests', Japan imposed additional sanctions, and the very thought and talk of preemptive strike by Japan is something that must horrify China.
Count the days, it will be few, before North Korea starts to listen very attentively to China.
24 posted on
07/10/2006 2:58:54 AM PDT by
IrishMike
(Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This is a good idea although I am not sure if pacifist Japan would go ahead with pre-emptive strikes on NK's nuclear installations but they certainly have all the necessary technological and military strength to do the damage. If they do actually go ahead with the pre-emptive strikes there would be a lesson there for India to learn, that can repeat on NK's other ally Pakistan and Iran.
Most importantly it will send a message around all the rogue wannabe nuke powers that they will not get away with nuclear blackmail. Any such attempt will invite massive and real damage, not simply harsh words.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Which Chinese General said, "I fear we have woken a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve."
26 posted on
07/10/2006 3:05:21 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
To: TigerLikesRooster
To: TigerLikesRooster
Get our troops out of SK and the Japanese can do what they want. Right now, they're sitting ducks.
To: TigerLikesRooster
see what happens when you piss off the japenese!!!
33 posted on
07/10/2006 4:20:37 AM PDT by
joe fonebone
(Time to bring back tar and feathering.)
To: TigerLikesRooster

"I'm here to kick ass and chew gum... and I'm all out of gum."
34 posted on
07/10/2006 4:24:41 AM PDT by
Jonah Hex
("How'd you get that scar, mister?" "Nicked myself shaving.")
To: TigerLikesRooster
china is treading in deep water, the sharks are gathering
oh......... north korea is the bad one....
china and north korea are treading in deep water, the sharks are gathering
39 posted on
07/10/2006 5:01:16 AM PDT by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This will shake things up!
What type of strike capability does Japan have? Aren't their planes and missiles of limited range?
43 posted on
07/10/2006 5:24:16 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The question is simple.
Does China want a militaried Japan?
Everything I know about Chinese fears, says "No".
50 posted on
07/10/2006 6:00:13 AM PDT by
Bogey78O
(<thinking of new tagline>)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The US will stand firmly behind Japan, of course, I'm sure that China realizes that Japan is a far worse enemy than the US would ever be because they will not stop with half measures in order to prevent world condemnation. Once armed, Japan will remain armed.
53 posted on
07/10/2006 6:23:27 AM PDT by
McGavin999
(If the intelligence agencies can't find the leakers how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This can't be true, the U.N. is gonna take care of the problem.
< /sarc >
57 posted on
07/10/2006 7:00:35 AM PDT by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson