Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MikefromOhio; BenLurkin; Central Scrutiniser
These people editing someone else's property without their permission is absolutely 100% wrong.

Correct. These companies should have worked with the full cooperation of the filmmakers.

BTW, I wonder if Medved will waste an entire hour of his show (if he hasn't already) lamenting this decision.

503 posted on 07/09/2006 1:55:21 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies ]


To: EveningStar

I wish they had just said that it was illegal to sell copies instead of the following garbage:

"Their (studios and directors) objective ... is to stop the infringement because of its irreparable injury to the creative artistic expression in the copyrighted movies," the judge wrote. "There is a public interest in providing such protection."

But I understand that there may be software that would "correct on the fly" even the original disks.


510 posted on 07/09/2006 2:03:57 PM PDT by OmahaFields ("What have been its fruits? ... superstition, bigotry and persecution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

I like Medved, but he can be very wrong at times.


627 posted on 07/09/2006 11:17:47 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser ("You can't really dust for vomit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson