Replies

"I am tired of illegal immigration and that is what people are talking about. Language, borders, culture... "

- One issue fanatics, whether they be left or right, are a dying breed in the 21st century. Modern world politics is far too complex to vote simply on one issue. You must look at the candidates records and balance the good against the bad and then decide who, on balance, represents most of the view that you can support.
To vote against someone whose opinions you don't agree with on immigration and then vote for someone whose views are exactly the same is stupid. I'm afraid it's the old question of the lessor of two evils.
When it comes to it, anyone is preferable to Hitlery because she has shown that she can lie and not be trusted to tell us what she really would do on important matters of national interest.

Posted by Alberta's Child to Sir Francis Dashwood; Blackirish; All
On News/Activism ^ 07/08/2006 9:42:58 AM PDT · 157 of 495 ^

I'm starting to see a trend here among Giuliani supporters. Whenever one of his flaming liberal positions is exposed, the natural response among his supporters has been to explain it away in one of two ways:

1. A flaming liberal position that he took as mayor of New York (openly violating the 1996 Federal law that prohibited cities like New York from establishing themselves as "sanctuaries" for illegal aliens, for example) was really necessary for him to get elected in New York City, and won't affect his performance as president because he'll change his position tomorrow (or next week, or next year, etc.).

2. A flaming liberal position he took as mayor of New York (supporting homosexual marriages and abortion through nine months of pregnancy, for example) will no longer be an issue because "these matters will be left to the states and cities" if he becomes president.

Point #1 is ludicrous because this is exactly what made it so clear that John Kerry was a fraud. I don't understand why anyone in the Republican Party would find that kind of sh!t endearing in a presidential candidate -- especially when it involves a situation in which the candidate in question really belongs in a Federal prison instead of at the top of a major party ticket.

Point #2 is ludicrous because it misses one very important point: Why would anyone expect Rudy Giuliani in a Federal capacity to "leave these issues to the states and cities" if the most radically liberal positions he took as mayor of New York involved issues that weren't even the responsibility of city government (i.e., abortion, illegal immigration, homosexual marriage, etc.)?!?!

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies