The founders also laid out a Principle that the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution.
Whether anyone likes it, legal abortion has been the law of the land since the early 70's.
So I guess since then, you, and those who think like you, see no reason for the existence of the United States.
In your opinion, it only takes that we have a President who wishs abortion would go away and sleeps with a gun under his bed, and hates gays, that all will be well. Only under that circumstance will it worth defending the United States?
I think you've really exposed yourself here as nothing more than a pragmatic, unprinicled political observer. If the U.S. Supreme Court decided tomorrow that Sabramerican no longer deserves any legal protection whatsoever, I am quite sure that you'd consider the U.S. Supreme Court and "the law of the land" completely irrelevant.
So I guess since then, you, and those who think like you, see no reason for the existence of the United States.
That's exactly what makes cases like Kelo v. New London and Roe v. Wade so damaging to this nation. In the last 40 years, the U.S. Supreme Court has done something that the Soviet Union and al-Qaeda could only dream of doing -- creating a civic/social order in this country that will eventually collapse under its own weight.
And lest you think things like "guns, gays, and God" are minor issues, just understand how closely these issues are related to many others that you might consider more important. For example, I actually look upon the whole ongoing illegal immigration debate with amusement -- because looking at it outside the context of a larger political/moral debate makes no sense at all. A nation that kills a million of its own children every year and then allows a million illegal immigrants to invade the country in the same year doesn't need "immigration reform" -- it needs a f#cking psychiatric examination from top to bottom.
Roe v. Wade had nothing to do with interpreting the Constitution. Even its defenders recognize that the SCOTUS made up the right to an abortion whole cloth, and stitiched it into the Constitution.
We've finally got a chance to reverse some of these abominable usurpations of power by liberal justices. We need at least two more socially conservative justices in the mold of Scalia and Alito to get the effort underway. The socially liberal Giuliani isn't likely to make that happen.
Giuliani is more likely to stick us with another Kennedy, Souter, or Breyer.
No thank you.
Whether anyone likes it, legal abortion has been the law of the land since the early 70's.
So I guess since then, you, and those who think like you, see no reason for the existence of the United States.
In your opinion, it only takes that we have a President who wishs abortion would go away and sleeps with a gun under his bed, and hates gays, that all will be well. Only under that circumstance will it worth defending the United States?
You really are a fool. The founders did not declare that the supreme court interprets the constituion and only a moderate/liberal would see it that way. It is called original intent for a reason.