Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
Reusability is mythical. New parts are made to replace stuff that is only good for a handful of launches (or one launch). Reprocessing costs for a launch runs to $500 million (a half billion $) and the 30 year old technology is obsolescent. The engines being developed for the new booster will cost less than the liquid fueled SSMEs, will be more powerful, and will not be retrieved from the drink.

Additional confirmation we are stuck in the Jules Verne/von Braun space exploration paradigms. There's no real break in the cost per pound of human space travel until space-directed nanotechnology becomes viable.

41 posted on 07/08/2006 9:21:42 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Fitzcarraldo
Additional confirmation we are stuck in the Jules Verne/von Braun space exploration paradigms. There's no real break in the cost per pound of human space travel until space-directed nanotechnology becomes viable.
Additional confirmation that the society has spent too much time watching the Millennium Falcon take off. :') What is space-directed nanotechnology?
45 posted on 07/08/2006 10:07:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson