Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scarborough Apologizes for Saying Dems Wouldn't Welcome OBL Capture
Hardball/NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 07/07/2006 6:37:32 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

by Mark Finkelstein

July 7, 2006

Does Norah O'Donnell read NewsBusters? Could it be pure coincidence that on this evening's 'What'd You Say?' Hardball segment featuring the audio highlights of the week Norah just happened to select two items we had featured here and here? Who knows?

In any case, Joe Scarborough took the occasion to apologize for being too mean to Democrats earlier in the show. For the record, the two soundbites featured were Joe Biden's Indian/7/11 slur, and Cindy Sheehan's pronouncement that she would rather live under Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez than George Bush. Panelist Tucker Carlson had the best line: "[Sheehan's] a pathetic figure. It would be a hard moral call whether or not to have her on. She's almost like a sideshow figure now." Too true.

Anyhow, back to Joe. Earlier in the segment he had said: "I can guarantee you if [OBL] were arrested tomorrow, Democrats, George Bush's nemesis, would say 'well it's not really that big of a deal anyway, because Americans are dying in Iraq.'"

Darn right they would. But for some reason, Joe abjectly backtracked later in the segment:

"I've got to apologize very quickly for my remark about Democrats wouldn't be happy about Osama Bin Laden being caught. I'm cranky today. I didn't mean it."

Really, Joe? If Hillary, Nancy and Harry woke up tomorrow, turned on the tube, and saw that OBL were caught, you honestly think they'd be happy?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Nevada; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2true2apologize; donotapologize; hardball; harryreid; hillary; joescarborough; msnbc; nancypelosi; norahodonnell; obl; osama; ritacosby; tuckercarlson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 07/07/2006 6:37:37 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...

Hardball/NewsBusters ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 07/07/2006 6:38:12 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Of all the things that need to be apologized for on Mess-NBC from Chris Matthews' hysterical partisan polemics to Keith Untermann's ugly and personal diatribes, this truth spoken by Scarborough is the one that gets an "I'm sorry?" Spare me.


3 posted on 07/07/2006 6:39:53 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Joes job is on the line

New MSNBC chief Dan Abrams made his first big changes to the news channel, shuffling its prime-time schedule and adding two hours of documentaries Mondays through Fridays.

Its core of "Hardball," "Countdown" and "Scarborough Country" will remain intact. Going off the air will be "Rita Cosby: Live & Direct," which had been in the 10 p.m. slot Mondays through Thursdays. Tucker Carlson, who joined MSNBC last year after a career at CNN, will move from 11 p.m. to airings at 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. where "The Abrams Report" used to be.

Abrams said that there wouldn't be any other major changes in the near future, though there will be some changes to both "The Situation With Tucker Carlson" and "Scarborough Country."

4 posted on 07/07/2006 6:44:41 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002764879


5 posted on 07/07/2006 6:45:16 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
"I can guarantee you if [OBL] were arrested tomorrow, Democrats, George Bush's nemesis, would say 'well it's not really that big of a deal anyway, because Americans are dying in Iraq.'"

This is merely stating the obvious, attested to Demaogues themselves as they have shown in their reactions to every other event in the war on terror that their sole purpose is to propagandize agains the WH. The only things disturbing here are that (1) this is an accurate reflection of the Demagogues, so what does that say about them, and (2) Joe didn't have the guts to stand by his statement.
6 posted on 07/07/2006 6:46:53 PM PDT by Enchante (Keller & Sulzberger: Forget elections, WE are the self-appointed judges of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The Dems wouldn't welcome OBL's capture between now and the November election.


7 posted on 07/07/2006 6:47:03 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Panelist Tucker Carlson had the best line: '[Sheehan's] a pathetic figure. It would be a hard moral call whether or not to have her on. She's almost like a sideshow figure now.'"

Ain't that too bad, Dr Frankenstein? These monsters just WON'T keep obeying their creators...
8 posted on 07/07/2006 6:50:00 PM PDT by decal (Different Tagline Tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Yeah, I sure heard nothing but lip service tepid replies of "We're glad BUTS..." from most Dems. when we nailed Zarqawi. All we heard from most of them was how it would make no difference. And even idiots like Durbin couldn't help himself by saying how Iraq is a failure.

Does anyone mean to say that if Bush nailed Bin LAden tomorrow and pumped his approval rating up to 60% and the GOP's chances in the elections were suddenly brightened that anyone in the Democratic leadership and all but few of the Democratic hard core would gladly take that over winning the mid-terms? Get real.


9 posted on 07/07/2006 6:50:49 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Personally, I think that Joe is 100% right on! OBL, the Iraq war, Zarqawi, the economy, and many other things are merely pawns in the democrats attempt to harm the Bush administration only to get themselves back in power. I don't think that it takes a rocket scientist to conclude that!

BTW, some former green beret said today on Fox that this is not a war on terrorism, it is a war on radical Islamic fascists who are hell bent on killing us. I think that he is absolutely correct and that the war on terrorism should should be relabeled as the 'radical Islamic' war......

10 posted on 07/07/2006 6:51:50 PM PDT by ErieGeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

They are already doing polling on it.


11 posted on 07/07/2006 6:52:53 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ErieGeno
I think that Joe is 100% right on!

Yes, except for the fact that he later backed off his own statement!

12 posted on 07/07/2006 6:54:00 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Okay..I see your thread..but, I thought the part of the show with Paul Hackett (ex Cong. candidate, ex Sen. candidate)...with the father of the guy that is refusing to go to Iraq was ALSO very remarkable.

I was astonished that Paul Hackett came out as forcefully as he did AGAINST the guy...being a lib syncophant.

RE: what you posted about...Scarborough and Tucker are shams and MSNBC should NEVER, EVER refer to them as "conservative" again.


13 posted on 07/07/2006 6:58:39 PM PDT by Txsleuth (FREEPATHON TIME---PLEASE GIVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

In his role as a lawyer, Hackett has been defending a Marine charged in an incident in Iraq. So he's kind of come full circle. Hey, I can't cover everything!


14 posted on 07/07/2006 7:01:21 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1662152/posts?page=1

Ta-DA!


15 posted on 07/07/2006 7:01:40 PM PDT by Txsleuth (FREEPATHON TIME---PLEASE GIVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The fact he had to publicly apologize meant he cut them the right way with the sword of truth.


16 posted on 07/07/2006 7:01:53 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I have never respected Joe because of the way he acts on his show...especially being tagged as a "Republican"...but, any credibility he HAD is totally gone after that apology.


17 posted on 07/07/2006 7:04:29 PM PDT by Txsleuth (FREEPATHON TIME---PLEASE GIVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Must be the new house rule at MSNBC: do not criticize the Democrats on the air...


18 posted on 07/07/2006 7:08:31 PM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Joe was too mild...The Dems would welcome a mushroom cloud over an American city if they could pin it on Bush and win the election.


19 posted on 07/07/2006 7:18:24 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

He's right. No need to apologize. They'd be po'd.


20 posted on 07/07/2006 7:58:32 PM PDT by b4its2late (Earth is the insane asylum for the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson