Hmmm...most kids don't drive, so I'm not too worried. I'm also trying to comprehend the idea of parents letting their children play around railroad tracks unattended.
Nevertheless, the argument I was making to begin with was that the man seemed to think that there should be no train track scene in the movie partially because it reminded him too much of his daughter's death. I mean...he doesn't HAVE to go see the movie.
They don't have sex in grade school either but most conservatives believe school sex education classes give the wrong message.
I'm also trying to comprehend the idea of parents letting their children play around railroad tracks unattended.
This puzzles me. Where does this connect to the article?
Nevertheless, the argument I was making to begin with was that the man seemed to think that there should be no train track scene in the movie partially because it reminded him too much of his daughter's death.
No. For him it was warning bells. And ironic ones at that.