Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zon
Mob rule. Tyranny of majority. They violate individual life and property rights. That's why the founders detested democracy and created a representative republic

I am guessing that you are against any sort of ballot initiative.

If a local community comes to a consensus that they want to observe or not observe blue laws, it is not reasonable that they should be forced to bow to the will of vocal minority. Such coercion of the majority applied broadly would lead to chaos and foolishly accomodates the wishes of the squeaky wheel at the expense of the wishes of everyone else.

269 posted on 07/06/2006 1:22:41 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: Pete

If a local community comes to a consensus that they want to observe or not observe blue laws, it is not reasonable that they should be forced to bow to the will of vocal minority. Such coercion of the majority applied broadly would lead to chaos and foolishly accomodates [sic] the wishes of the squeaky wheel at the expense of the wishes of everyone else.

If a local community comes to a consensus that they want to observe or not observe blue laws (torture everyone named Pete, ostracize every Pete, etc.) it is not reasonable that they should be forced to bow to the will of vocal minority. Such coercion of the majority applied broadly would lead to chaos and foolishly accommodates the wishes of the squeaky wheel mob at the expense of the wishes of everyone else Petes.

Pete didn't harm another person and he is an animate being. Alcohol harmed no one and is an inanimate object. You are arguing to initiate harm/force against  a person that has not harmed another. To carry it out is immoral and criminal. Your individual rights end where another person's begin.

286 posted on 07/06/2006 1:46:43 PM PDT by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
If a local community comes to a consensus that they want to observe or not observe blue laws,

Rights are not determined by consensus.

it is not reasonable that they should be forced to bow to the will of vocal minority.

You misplace the force, the force is from those who would violate rights, not by those who defend rights.

Such coercion of the majority applied broadly would lead to chaos and foolishly accomodates the wishes of the squeaky wheel at the expense of the wishes of everyone else.

The confusion is because you seem to see those who assert their rights as coercing those who would violate them by using government force to attain their wishes.

My rights are not determined by the majority or the minority, they belong to me, and are not broker-able by anyone else.

323 posted on 07/06/2006 6:19:59 PM PDT by Protagoras (("Minimum-wage laws are one of the most powerful tools in the arsenal of racists." - Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson