[AuH2ORepublican]

"DeLay can get off the ballot if he wants by withdrawing. He won't do that."

---

If DeLay "withdraws," then the GOP won't have a nominee in the race (he can be replaced only for ineligibility) and the RAT Lampson will coast to victory. Why in the world would DeLay do that? I know you hate DeLay, but do you hate him enough to elect Lampson?

[AmishDude]

but do you hate him enough to elect Lampson?

Of course he does. You haven't paid attention to SSS for very long, have you?

[HostileTerritory]

I'm waiting to see if this appeal goes anywhere with the 5th--I have no idea how they view ballot-access issues--but if Delay's appeal fails, I hope that calmer heads in the RNCC accept that this seat will be lost for one term and ONE TERM only and resist the urge to pour millions of dollars down a rathole to prove a point.

Delay knows he can't win. This is difficult to watch happen.

[SolidSupplySide]

I was responding to MNJohnnie who doesn't seem to understand the distinction between removing DeLay's name from the ballot and replacing him. If all that was desired was removing DeLay from the ballot, that is possible. That's all I was saying.

I advocated keeping our district Republican. Recall that I supported Tom Campbell in the primary.