Connecticut ping!
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.
Posted on 07/05/2006 8:47:07 PM PDT by bitt
US Senator Joe Lieberman, who's in the midst of a tough Democratic primary fight, is hated by many members of his own party. In fact, his "friend" and partner in the 2000 presidential election, Al Gore, recently declined a request from the Lieberman campaign to endorse the moderate senator from Connecticut. Gore gave reporters some malarkey about his personal policy of not endorsing candidates, but it wasn't that long ago that he threw his weight behind Howard Dean with a surprising endorsement prior to the media circus "Dean Machine" collapsing. When Lieberman ran and lost as Gore's candidate for Vice President, not once did Lieberman accuse anyone of stealing the election.
Behind the scenes the liberal-left Democrats want to punish the Senator for a couple of reasons. First, Joe Lieberman wholeheartedly supports the President and the Pentagon in the war on terrorism and the Iraq conflict. Following his fact-finding trip to Iraq, Lieberman gave a speech on the floor of the Senate one wishes came from a Republican.
He articulately explained why the US is doing a good job in a bad situation and why the US cannot back down from its enemies. During the Laura Ingraham Show, Ingraham played a few segments of Lieberman's speech and one could easily figure out that his comments were directed at his fellow Democrats and the few Republicans -- Senator Chuck Hagel, Senator Lincoln Chaffee, etc. -- trying to sound like Democrats.
The second reason for the Democrat Party's souring on Lieberman is that he IS a true moderate. Just by being himself, he exposes the likes of Kerry, Durbin, Murtha, Kennedy, Obama, Clinton, Biden, and the rest of them as liberal-left opportunists who attempt to cover their radicalism with a blanket of political moderation.
How can a Joe Biden or John Edwards run for the Democrat presidential nomination as moderates when Lieberman is around? How can a cut-and-run guy like Kerry portray himself as a reasonable liberal with Lieberman still around? These political bomb-throwers sound as if their entire political platform is their hatred for Bush and "his war," while Joe Lieberman speaks to the American people about issues and his positions.
While Lieberman is a Democrat in the tradition of FDR, Truman and JFK, the rest of his party has sunk to the lowest depths of Stalinism, flirting with treason and betrayal as part of their strategy to gain power while accusing others of what they themselves do.
Except for conservative talk radio shows and Fox News Channel, Lieberman is rarely courted by the mainstream news media for interviews or opinions anymore. For instance, when the Democrats attempted to pass "cut-and-run" and "cut-and-jog" Iraq withdrawal resolutions, Lieberman's press releases and comments were entirely ignored by the MSM, who, after all, serve as the public-relations arm of the Democrat National Committee. And the left-wing blogosphere despise him to no end.
So now, Sen. Lieberman is being challenged by a lightweight -- a businessman, Ned Lamont, the owner of a cable television company with absolutely no real experience holding public office. Lamont has put almost $2 million of his own money into his campaign, and viciously calls Lieberman a Republican lapdog. He also accuses him of straying from his Democratic roots. In fact, when he talks about his opponent, it sounds as if he's running against a Republican.
"While I believe that I will win the Aug. 8 primary, I know there are no guarantees in elections," Lieberman told reporters on Monday. "No one really knows how many Democrats will come out to vote on what may be a hot day in August."
Lieberman said if he loses the primary, he would run in November as a petitioning Democrat, but most recognize that as a euphemism for running as an Independent. He said he plans to remain part of the Democrat caucus in the Senate if reelected, but he is sure to get a cold reception if he wins as an Independent.
Once a Democrat Party stalwart and the party's 2000 vice presidential nominee, Lieberman has fallen into disfavor with some Connecticut Democrats for his support of the Iraq war and his perceived closeness to President Bush. When he ran for the 2004 presidential nomination, standing next to the flip-flopper John Kerry, the metrosexual, smooth-talking John Edwards, the poverty pimp Rev. Al Sharpton and, of course, Dr. "Demento" Howard Dean during debates, Lieberman sounded reasonable, knowledgeable and honest on his positions. He also received little support from the party faithful who have moved even further to the left since the 2000 election.
The Dems want Lieberman muzzled and they are working quietly to torpedo his campaign.
The Democrat Party strategy has been somewhat effective. A Quinnipiac University poll has Lamont gaining ground among Democrat voters, although Lieberman maintains high ratings among Republicans and unaffiliated voters. Unaffiliated voters are the state's largest voting bloc, followed by Democrats and Republicans, according to Quinnipiac pollsters.
The poll reveals that if Lieberman runs as an Independent, he would win with 56 percent of the vote, compared with 18 percent for Lamont and 8 percent for Republican Alan Schlesinger, a moderate. And that surely angers -- even scares -- the Democrats.
I have a question as I see all the events surround Lieberman and the likelyhood that Joe may run as independent. If Joe does run as an Independent, and assuming he wins...who does Joe caucus with? With Dems or Republicans? Anyone has any ideas? If Joe is forced to run as an Independent he certainly does not have alligience to the Dems...
I agree with your first statement Spirit.
This one I may be misconstruing as it may usually be the women who decides to have the abortion.
Getting pregnant in the first place is the responsibility of both. I am Catholic so hold strict ideas on this.
Well, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, pardon me!!
Yes, I think I probably based my reply on that impression of him.
Well, possibly just this once!
Connecticut ping!
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.
My point was that if males would be man enough to marry the girls and be breadwinner and protector, most girls would choose gladly to keep their babies.
Exactly right Spirit! I knew your thoughts in your statement had more meaning behind it.
The Republican running against Lieberman is a "moderate".
In other words, he's pro-abortion.
I don't vote for pro-abortion Republicans, unless the alternative is an anti-war Democrat kook. So, when I vote for Christopher Shays, it will be solely because he supports the war while is opponent, Diane Farrell, is actually a very talented lady as capable as Shays...but she is against the war. So I vote for Shays.
But if it's Lieberman versus some pro-abortion Republican, I have no incentive to get out there and vote for either. If it's Lieberman versus some anti-war nutjob, obviously I have to support Lieberman. However, Connecticut primaries are closed, so Republicans and Independents don't get to vote in the Democratic primary.
Nope.
that was good, avenge arafat...very good
I think the libs in New Jersey are listening to different tunes these days! Talk about not getting it together,,,,sheesh!
The difference between a Republican and a Democrat is the Democrat is a cannibal--they have to live off each other--while the Republicans, why, they live off the Democrats." -- Will Rogers
Because he is pro-life, he really believes in God, and he's a practicing Jew?
No brainer.
Lieberman is the democrats John Mclaim..
Why are those groups sabotaging Joe Lieberman.
Because he has a chance against Hillary.
Because he's of the hebrew faith, jewish origin, and would have their backing.
Hillary hasn't figured out how to lock down that voting block.
(brilliant minds think alike). You beat me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.