[pissant]

I2 testified first that KP1 threw the woman to the floor, then contradicts himself and says I3 did it. But she was presumably not bleeding when that occurred either way, and was only shot after the rapes.

There is ALOT more to the story, and of particular significance is the testimony of I5 and the fact that he and others including Iraqi army checked out the deaths on 3/11. Which would be before the 3/12 murders.

[OmahaFields]

I2 testified first that KP1 threw the woman to the floor, then contradicts himself and says I3 did it. But she was presumably not bleeding when that occurred either way, and was only shot after the rapes.

Read it again. It was two different women.

[TexKat]

Charges not imminent in Army rape-murder probe

By Kristin Roberts Reuters

Wednesday, July 5, 2006; 2:13 PM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Army has restricted the activities of soldiers suspected in the rape and slaying of an Iraqi woman and killings of her family amid an investigation but charges are not imminent, a defense official said on Wednesday.

The Army plans to interview former Pfc. Steven Green, 21, who was detained in the case earlier this week in the United States, before deciding on charges against as many as four soldiers still in Iraq.

Green might not be questioned before he appears in U.S. court, likely next week, an official said.

[OmahaFields]

There is ALOT more to the story, and of particular significance is the testimony of I5 and the fact that he and others including Iraqi army checked out the deaths on 3/11. Which would be before the 3/12 murders.

Where do you conclude 3/12. You original post asks whether it is 3/11 or 3/12.

[Pikachu_Dad]

There is ALOT more to the story, and of particular significance is the testimony of I5 and the fact that he and others including Iraqi army checked out the deaths on 3/11. Which would be before the 3/12 murders.

WHY? First that may just be a typo. Obviously you can't check out murders that haven't happened yet.