Skip to comments.
Frist: Europe Missile-Defense Site Needed
Voter's Domain ^
| June 30, 2006
Posted on 07/05/2006 12:17:40 PM PDT by foxy_maiden
In a letter to the president, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) urged Bush on Friday to intensify efforts to put interceptor missiles at a Europe site. ...
(Excerpt) Read more at votersdomain.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; billfrist; europe; frist; geopolitics; iran; missiledefense; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: foxy_maiden
And Europe will be charged how much for this service?? Why do we need to continue to pay for Europe's defense?? Let them develop their own missile shield.
2
posted on
07/05/2006 12:19:38 PM PDT
by
MikeA
(Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
To: MikeA
Indeed. If they want a missile sheld, let them ask for it and pay for it. If it is needed to protect our troops in Europe ... let's get cracking on that exit strategy for WWII.
3
posted on
07/05/2006 12:21:45 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("I'm all in favor of a dignified retirement: Why not try it on Kerry as a pilot program?" M. Steyn)
To: NonValueAdded; MikeA
Now if it were to be based in Poland, like the extended version of the article alluded to, or all intercepts were designed to happen over Berlin and Paris, maybe it would be worthwile to put the missiles in Europe instead of the East Coast.
4
posted on
07/05/2006 12:27:33 PM PDT
by
steveegg
(It's time once again to keep this lifeforce running - https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
To: foxy_maiden
Let's face it, this shield is not going to be much use against Russia. It's only real use to Europe would be vis a vis Iran, or maybe Pakistan.
5
posted on
07/05/2006 12:28:10 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: NonValueAdded
LOL, I like the comment about an exit strategy from WW2. Missile shield for US bases in Europe for sure. Missile shields for the rest of Europe at cost plus a standard 33% mark-up.
6
posted on
07/05/2006 12:28:13 PM PDT
by
MikeA
(Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
To: MikeA
When I read it I don't see that it is for Europe's defence, rather than a more strategic place for us to shoot down a weapon.
7
posted on
07/05/2006 12:30:19 PM PDT
by
RDTF
("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
To: foxy_maiden
If Europe is interested in paying for these sites, fine. But for free? No way.
8
posted on
07/05/2006 12:30:27 PM PDT
by
rhombus
To: RDTF
That is correct. The Alaska site would have a limited radius of action and the European site would cover some of the other routes between Asia and America. A site in Cuba would nearly complete the circle.
9
posted on
07/05/2006 12:34:51 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: foxy_maiden
excuse me but I see no reason to put up a missile shield for EU... they're all a bunch of ingrate dollar sucking bastards who's only reason to exist is to critisize America, EU UN same crowd... we should be building a 50 ft. wall on our south border, which is the more pressing issue atm, not caring for the bastards across the pond.
10
posted on
07/05/2006 12:38:35 PM PDT
by
Cinnamon
To: foxy_maiden
Why piss more of my taxpayers money away?
11
posted on
07/05/2006 12:40:40 PM PDT
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: foxy_maiden
Frist is an idiot... Why should we spend American taxpayer dollars on a European defense system?? Shouldn't they make/fund their own?
To: foxy_maiden
Europe? How about near N. Korea?
To: foxy_maiden
Well that'll sure make the euro-weenies wet themselves.
14
posted on
07/05/2006 12:53:58 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: Element187
Frist is an idiot... Why should we spend American taxpayer dollars on a European defense system?? Shouldn't they make/fund their own?
Sigh. This isn't to protect Europe. This is to protect the U.S.
15
posted on
07/05/2006 1:05:10 PM PDT
by
drjimmy
To: foxy_maiden
If any FReeper has access to LexusNexus, now would be an excellent time to revisit some of the reasons the left lectured us all on for why exactly it would be a bad idea to work on an Anti-Ballistic Missile system.
To: foxy_maiden
How about we enlarge the sites in Alaska and California and put one in the south to perhaps deal with Chavez in the future.
17
posted on
07/05/2006 1:07:05 PM PDT
by
jbwbubba
To: foxy_maiden
If it would benefit the US to have a shield in Europe by improving our ability to intercept missiles inbound to the US then I'm for it.
If it is for the benefit of Europe then let Europe formally ask the US for such a shield and let them propose a formal plan that would address location, cost, political fallout, etc. In other words, it would be a service we would be willing to provide given they pay for such a service. Our NATO allies didn't have our back against the regime in Iraq so why should we have their back against the regime in Iran? They must realize that everything comes at a cost, including the protection we are willing to provide as an ally.
Of course France is excluded from having the right to any protection we might be able to provide as they are not an ally in any sense. Besides, France will be imploding any day now and no one will want to waste a good missile on them anyway.
To: RDTF
From where? Iran's missiles can't reach the US and I'm not sure we need to be all geared up for a nuclear confrontation with Russia. Either way, it's a dumb idea. If we're going to invest in a missile shield it needs to be over the US West Coast in case the Mental Case Midget, aka Mental Midget, in North Korea manages to get his missiles to fly.
19
posted on
07/05/2006 1:23:12 PM PDT
by
MikeA
(Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
To: RedWhiteAndBlueBlood
yeah.. I do agree with what you've said.. If it's for our country's best interest, then we have to support it; but, if it's for Europe, then negotiations must be done accordingly so that our country's efforts will be rewarded.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson